Laserfiche WebLink
Environmental Checklist Aesthetics <br /> Initial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration 15 <br />Table 2 Approximate Heights of Adjacent Buildings to Project Site <br />Building Address <br />Building Orientation <br />to Project Site <br />Approximate Height of Building* <br />(in feet) <br />Difference in Height to Project <br />(in feet) <br />Proposed Project n/a 40 n/a <br />2690 Alvarado St North 25 -15 <br />610 Aladdin Ave East 48 +8 <br />2777 Alvarado St West 25 -15 <br />2823 Alvarado St West 21 -19 <br />2800 Alvarado St South 36 -4 <br />Note: Building heights were approximated by using Google Earth. <br />Therefore, although the project would increase the height of onsite structures compared to current <br />conditions, it would be consistent with heights of surrounding uses. <br />The project would also improve the visual quality of the project site. The project would involve <br />replacing a vacant, dilapidated warehouse building with a visually modern office and advanced <br />manufacturing development. The project would also increase onsite landscaping coverage by <br />planting an additional 64 accent trees, ornamental grasses, foundation-screening planting, and <br />streetscape landscaping throughout the site. The corner of the project site at the intersection of <br />Alvarado Street and Aladdin Avenue would include a landscaped bioswale featuring native grasses. <br />Currently, the existing buildings have loading docks on the southwest corner of the site on Alvarado <br />Street (Figure 3) and on Aladdin Avenue. The project would include loading docks on the rear <br />(southern) portion of the site, thus screening them from view. Although the project would change <br />the surrounding visual character of the project site it would not degrade the visual character or <br />quality of the site and its surroundings. Impacts would be less than significant. <br />LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT <br />d. Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect <br />day or nighttime views in the area? <br />The project site is in an urbanized area with relatively high levels of existing lighting. The adjacent <br />commercial, industrial, and roadway uses generate light and glare along all sides of the property. <br />Primary sources of light adjacent to the project site include lighting associated with the existing <br />commercial and industrial buildings, including building mounted lighting and headlights from <br />vehicles on nearby streets, and street lights. The primary source of glare adjacent to the project site <br />is the sun’s reflection from metallic, glass and light-colored surfaces on buildings and on vehicles <br />parked on adjacent streets and in adjacent parking areas. <br />The project would introduce new sources of lighting in the form of building-mounted lighting and <br />parking lot lighting. Light could also be visible from the building’s proposed skylights. However, <br />these sources of light would be similar to existing sources of lighting on the site and its surroundings <br />and would be consistent with other uses in the area. In addition, the building-mounted lighting and <br />parking lot lighting would be equipped with light-emitting diode (LED) lighting and all electrical <br />designs would be compliant with California Green Building Standards (CalGreen) and Title 24 Codes. <br />CalGreen Section 5.106.8 regulates light pollution by establishing maximum Backlight, Uplight, and <br />Glare (BUG) ratings for light fixtures. According to the project’s photometric plan (Turtle & Hughes <br />2017), the lighting orientation and use of LED lighting would minimize light spillover such that <br />312