My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
5A Public Hearings 2018 0507
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2018
>
Packet 2018 0507
>
5A Public Hearings 2018 0507
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2018 12:50:39 PM
Creation date
5/2/2018 12:49:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
5/7/2018
Retention
PERM
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1053
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
City of San Leandro Alvarado Commerce Center Project <br /> 60 <br />i. Would the project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death <br />involving flooding, including that occurring as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? <br />The project site is located in the inundation areas of two dams: Upper San Leandro Reservoir and <br />Lake Chabot. Lake Chabot is classified as a high hazard dam because its failure could result in a <br />significant loss of life and property damage. The California Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD) <br />inspects each dam on an annual basis to ensure the dam is safe, performing as intended, and is not <br />developing problems (San Leandro 2016a). <br />EBMUD owns and operates these two reservoirs, which store runoff from local watersheds for <br />water supply. Lake Chabot was built in 1892 and impounds approximately three billion gallons of <br />water that is used for non-potable water supply, emergency water supply, conservation/storage of <br />local runoff, and recreation (San Leandro 2016a). <br />Four miles upstream is the Upper San Leandro Reservoir, which was constructed in 1977 and holds <br />more than 13 billion gallons of water. This reservoir is closed to public access, except for the trail <br />system, and is used for raw water storage. While failure of these dams is extremely unlikely, most of <br />San Leandro would be flooded in the event of a dam failure of either Lake Chabot or Upper San <br />Leandro Reservoir (San Leandro 2016a). <br />Requirements for earthquake and flood safety for the EBMUD dams are imposed by the DSOD. <br />Chabot Dam is inspected monthly by EBMUD personnel along with annual inspections by DSOD <br />personnel. DSOD requires that embankments under its jurisdiction are safe enough to withstand a <br />maximum credible earthquake without an uncontrolled release of reservoir water. In 2003, DSOD <br />requested EBMUD to perform a stability evaluation of the Chabot Dam. The results, which were <br />issued in 2005, indicated that upgrading the dam and retrofitting the outlet works was warranted. <br />An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified in December 2013 that discusses the proposed <br />seismic upgrade program in detail and the dam improvements are expected to begin in 2016. <br />However, EBMUD considers both Lake Chabot and Upper San Leandro dams to be stable and does <br />not expect them to breach (San Leandro 2016a). <br />The risk of dam failure is extremely low, with seismic strengthening soon to take place at Lake <br />Chabot, and continuing maintenance and further improvements taking place at both dams in the <br />future (Leandro 2016a). In addition, the project does not involve residential uses and would not <br />substantially increase the population of the area. Further, the project would not increase the <br />number of employees such that substantial indirect population growth in the area would occur <br />(Section 10, Population and Housing). <br />Due to the very low probability of a dam failure that results in inundation of San Leandro and that <br />no housing or population increases would occur from the project, this impact would be less than <br />significant. <br />LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT <br />j. Would the project result in inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? <br />The nearest largest body of water to the project is the San Francisco Bay, which is over two miles to <br />the west of the project site. The project is also over two miles from Lake Chabot to the northeast. <br />Since the project site is not near any large bodies of water and is two miles inland from the San <br />Francisco Bay, the project site would not be subject to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. <br />No impact would occur. <br />NO IMPACT <br />357
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.