Reso 2018-116 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Interview with Internal Leadership Team 68 1 P City of San Leandro, CA Fiber Master Plan ��IIIIIIIIIIIIIII Key Findings Opportunities & Needs • Focus for project will be on infrastructure, but • Magellan recommends City retain also for the City to become "smart" by ownership of light poles and cabinets in leveraging vertical assets in a way that are not the rights-of-way. The public right-of-way currently used. is where the City's smart assets will reside. • There is no policy that addresses light pole • When telecom permit is requested —this attachments, but City does own and the poles should signal potential revenue are "free of clutter". PG&E owns the power opportunities. This also applies to wireless poles (City owns light poles). (lease fee). • There is a JPA that governs use of PG&E poles • Should address changes to existing permit (AT&T, Comcast, PG&E). process or establish new ordinance where • There are underground initiatives, such as on there is an absence. E14. Magellan can provide possible lease • Developing a sound, "good governance" rates/incremental savings from open trench policy framework is key to establishing policies. sustainable change. The City should • Right-of-way permits go through Traffic & maintain control over their own assets (do Engineering; attachment to City property not sub contract to another entity to permits is handled by Public Works. manage). • City has not established any rental fees for • 5G offers a huge opportunity — more poles, including fee for maintenance. dense wave lengths, so more microcells will be needed. City should leverage their poles and create revenue opportunities for carriers in 5G rather than allowing incumbent to dig for more fiber trenching to micro cell sites. 68 1 P City of San Leandro, CA Fiber Master Plan