My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2019-171
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2019
>
Reso 2019-171
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2019 12:33:43 PM
Creation date
12/6/2019 12:32:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
10/21/2019
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Checklist <br />Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br /> <br />General Plan Consistency Checklist 45 <br />8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br /> <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Less than <br />Significant or <br />Less than <br />Significant <br />with <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated No Impact <br />Analyzed in <br />the Prior EIR <br />Would the project: <br />a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, <br />either directly or indirectly, that may <br />have a significant impact on the <br />environment? □ ■ □ ■ <br />b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or <br />regulation adopted for the purpose of <br />reducing the emissions of greenhouse <br />gases? □ ■ □ ■ <br />Analysis in the General Plan EIR <br />Impacts to greenhouse gas emissions were analyzed in Section 4.6 of the General Plan EIR. Impacts <br />from the generation of greenhouse gas emissions were determined to be less than significant with <br />no mitigation measures required. Impacts regarding the consistency with applicable plans were <br />determined to be significant and unavoidable with no feasible mitigation measures available (City of <br />San Leandro 2016b). <br />The following describes the analysis included in the General Plan EIR and provides a streamlined <br />review to determine whether there would be project-specific impacts that are either 1) peculiar to <br />the project or the parcel on which the project is located; 2) were not previously analyzed in the <br />General Plan EIR as significant effects; 3) are potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative <br />impacts that were not previously discussed in the General Plan EIR; or 4) are now determined to <br />have a more severe impact than discussed in the General Plan EIR due to substantial new <br />information. <br />Threshold <br />The majority of individual projects do not generate sufficient GHG emissions to influence climate <br />change directly, by themselves. However, physical changes caused by a project can contribute <br />incrementally to significant cumulative effects, even if individual changes resulting from a project <br />are limited. The issue of climate change typically involves an analysis of whether a project’s <br />contribution towards an impact would be cumulatively considerable. “Cumulatively considerable” <br />means that the incremental effects of an individual project are significant, when viewed in <br />connection with the effects of past projects, other current projects, and probable future projects <br />(CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064[h][1]). <br />In late 2015, the California Supreme Court’s Newhall Ranch decision confirmed that there are <br />multiple potential pathways for evaluating GHG emissions consistent with CEQA, depending on the <br />circumstances of a given project (Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish and Wildlife
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.