My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8D Consent 2020 0928
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020
>
Packet 2020 0928
>
8D Consent 2020 0928
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2020 3:58:50 PM
Creation date
9/23/2020 12:22:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
9/28/2020
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2020-123 Clean Air Grant Funding with BAAQMD Class IV Bike Lanes
(Approved)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2020
Reso 2020-124 Reduction in Vehicle Travel Lanes and Bicycle Lane on Fairmont Drive
(Approved)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Page 12 <br /> <br /> <br />Fairmont Drive Class IV Bike Lane Installation Project November 2, 2018 <br /> <br />Cumulative Plus Project Conditions Operational Analysis <br />DKS revised the roadway geometry in the Synchro models to test the effect of the lane <br />reduction. Figure 5 illustrates the roadway and intersection geometry for the plus project <br />conditions. As shown in Table 8, delay and LOS would remain within acceptable limits after <br />project implementation. <br />Table 9 shows the Arterial LOS analysis results. As shown, the corridor is expected to <br />maintain the Cumulative (no project) LOS for most scenarios. However, it is expected to <br />deteriorate to LOS F in the eastbound direction during the AM peak period. <br />It should be noted that coordination of the Fairmont Drive corridor would improve arterial <br />operations. However, it was assumed that current coordination priorities along Hesperian <br />Boulevard and E. 14th Street would be maintained. To be conservative, it was assumed that <br />the two corridors would continue to have different cycle lengths, not allowing for the <br />coordination of the Fairmont Drive corridor. <br />Appendix C shows the expected queuing for the Cumulative Plus Project conditions. In <br />general, the project is expected to result in increased queuing. During the PM peak period the <br />eastbound queue is expected to spill back from Bayfair Drive past Hesperian Boulevard. <br /> <br />Table 8: Cumulative Plus Project Delay (Seconds)/LOS <br />Study Intersection Intersection Control AM <br />Peak <br />PM <br />Peak <br />4) Fairmont Drive/Hesperian Boulevard Signalized 51.6/D 72.9/E <br />5) Fairmont Drive/Bayfair Drive Signalized 24.3/C 64.0/E <br />6) Fairmont Drive/E. 14th Street (SR 185) Signalized 49.2/D 60.4/E <br /> <br />Table 9: Cumulative Plus Project Arterial LOS <br /> Study Segment Signal Delay <br />(s) <br />Arterial <br />Speed (mph) <br />Arterial <br />LOS <br />AM <br />EB: Hesperian Boulevard to E.14th Street 66.2 9.4 F <br />WB: E. 14th Street to Hesperian Boulevard 113.9 6.4 F <br />PM <br />EB: Hesperian Boulevard to E.14th Street 175.9 4.4 F <br />WB: E.14th Street to Hesperian Boulevard 59.7 9.8 F <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />175
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.