My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10B Action 2021 0104
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2021
>
Packet 2021 0104
>
10B Action 2021 0104
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2020 5:43:30 PM
Creation date
12/30/2020 5:41:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
1/4/2021
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Page 8 <br /> <br /> <br />Complete Streets Evaluation – Hesperian Blvd November 9, 2018 <br />CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS ANALYSIS <br />DKS also evaluated the operation of Hesperian Boulevard under the cumulative condition. The <br />cumulative scenario assumes that the transit-oriented development has been constructed. <br />Cumulative Conditions Operational Analysis <br />Cumulative traffic operations at the five study intersections and along the corridor were <br />assessed using Synchro software. Expected turn movement counts for the future year were <br />provided by the City of San Leandro. The AM and PM peak hour counts as well as roadway and <br />intersection geometry for all five signalized intersections are illustrated in Figure 4. <br />As shown in Table 5, all study intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable LOS <br />during the Cumulative AM and PM peak periods. Improvement from existing conditions (current <br />signal timing) at some intersections is due to signal timing modifications. However, it was <br />assumed that the cycle length would not exceed 150 seconds. The detailed reports from <br />Synchro are included in Appendix 1. <br />Table 6 shows the Arterial LOS analysis results. As shown, the corridor is expected to operate <br />at acceptable LOS. <br />Table 5: Cumulative Delay (Seconds)/LOS <br />Study Intersection Intersection <br />Control <br />AM <br />Peak <br />PM <br />Peak <br />1) Hesperian Boulevard & Fairmont Drive Signalized 60.4/E 75.9/E <br />2) Hesperian Boulevard & Bayfair Drive Signalized 13.4/B 21.7/C <br />3) Hesperian Boulevard & Thornally Drive Signalized 52.3/D 51.3/D <br />4) Hesperian Boulevard & Drew Street Signalized 20.1/B 4.4/A <br />5) Hesperian Boulevard & Springlake Drive Signalized 22.4/C 21.7/C <br />Note: Signal retiming assumed for Cumulative condition. Reduction in delay from existing conditions <br />(current signal timing) is due to retiming. <br /> <br />Table 6: Cumulative Arterial LOS <br /> <br />Study Segment <br />Signal Delay <br />(s) <br />Arterial <br />Speed <br />(mph) <br />Arterial <br />LOS <br />AM <br />NB: Springlake Drive to Fairmont Drive 81.8 14.9 E <br />SB: Fairmont Drive to Springlake Drive 53.5 18.2 D <br />PM <br />NB: Springlake Drive to Fairmont Drive 72.5 15.9 E <br />SB: Fairmont Drive to Springlake Drive 33.7 21.5 D <br /> <br />481
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.