My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
5A Public Hearings 2021 0706
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2021
>
Packet 2021 0706
>
5A Public Hearings 2021 0706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2021 8:02:46 PM
Creation date
7/1/2021 7:50:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
7/6/2021
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2021-105 Callan & East 14th Project CUP, Parking and Site Plan
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
May 19, 2021 <br />Page 17 <br /> <br /> <br />5005-004acp <br /> <br /> printed on recycled paper <br />significance threshold of 10 in one million, and should have been disclosed as a <br />significant impact in the Checklist, but was not.73 <br /> <br />The Checklist conflates analysis and mitigation by concluding that impacts <br />would be less than significant because Uniformly Applicable Development Policies <br />would decrease cancer risk impacts to the off-site residential MER from 54.7 in a <br />million to 4.9 in a million.74 This is an additional CEQA violation.75 <br /> <br />In light of the inadequate health risk analysis presented in the Checklist, <br />SWAPE conducted their own health risk analysis using the Project’s construction <br />and operational emissions, as seen in the table below.76 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />73 Checklist, p. 4-18, concluding that construction-related health impacts would be less than <br />significant. <br />74 Checklist, p. 4-18. <br />75 Lotus v. Dep't of Transp. (2014) 223 Cal. App. 4th 645, 651-52. <br />76 SWAPE Comments p. 21 <br />The Closest Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor <br />Activity Duration <br />(years) <br />Concentration <br />(ug/m3) <br />Breathing <br />Rate (L/kg‐ <br />day) <br />ASF Cancer Risk <br />with ASFs* <br />Construction 0.25 * 361 10 * <br />3rd Trimester <br />Duration 0.25 <br />3rd <br />Trimester <br />Exposure <br /> <br />Construction 1.42 * 1090 10 * <br />Operation 0.58 0.3138 1090 10 2.6E‐05 <br />Infant Exposure <br />Duration 2.00 Infant <br />Exposure 2.6E‐05 <br />Operation 14.00 0.3138 572 3 8.2E‐05 <br />Child Exposure <br />Duration 14.00 Child <br />Exposure 8.2E‐05 <br />Operation 14.00 0.3138 261 1 1.3E‐05 <br />Adult Exposure <br />Duration 14.00 Adult <br />Exposure 1.3E‐05 <br />Lifetime Exposure <br />Duration 30.00 Lifetime <br />Exposure 1.2E‐04 <br />* Construction‐related cancer risk calculated separately in the Checklist. <br />76
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.