My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
5A Public Hearings 2021 0706
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2021
>
Packet 2021 0706
>
5A Public Hearings 2021 0706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2021 8:02:46 PM
Creation date
7/1/2021 7:50:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
7/6/2021
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2021-105 Callan & East 14th Project CUP, Parking and Site Plan
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
May 6, 2021 <br />Page 14 <br /> <br /> <br />5005-003acp <br /> <br /> printed on recycled paper <br />generally no longer the purview of the CEQA process to evaluate the impact of <br />existing environmental conditions on any given project. As a result, while the noise <br />from existing sources is taken into account as part of the baseline, the direct effects <br />of exterior noise from nearby noise sources relative to land use compatibility of the <br />project is no longer a required topic for impact evaluation under CEQA and no <br />determination of significance is required.”58 <br /> <br />Reliance on CBIA is misplaced here. CBIA explicitly provides that when a <br />proposed project risks exacerbating environmental conditions that already exist, an <br />agency must analyze the potential impacts on future residents or users.59 “In those <br />specific instances, it is the project's impact on the environment—and not the <br />environment's impact on the project—that compels an evaluation of how future <br />residents or users could be affected by exacerbated conditions.”60 Here, the <br />increased traffic resulting from Project construction and operation will constitute an <br />exacerbation of noise impacts in the area and must be analyzed. It is not sufficient <br />that the Checklist relies on the analysis in the 2035 General Plan EIR, because this <br />Project will exacerbate existing noise impacts. An Infill EIR must be prepared to <br />adequately analyze and mitigate the exacerbation of noise impacts from this <br />Project. <br /> <br />iii. Traffic Impacts <br /> <br />The Project will have significant new impacts from traffic. Our traffic expert <br />Mr. Smith determined that the Project’s non-residential component would create a <br />significant transportation impact. The increased transportation impact would be an <br />exacerbation of existing environmental conditions in San Leandro and requires <br />adequate analysis under an Infill EIR. <br /> <br />The Zoning Code provides that the Board can only approve a project if they <br />determine “[t]hat the proposed use will not create adverse impacts on traffic or <br />create demands exceeding the capacity of public services and facilities...”61 The <br />Project cannot be approved by the Board because the Project would create adverse <br />impacts on traffic and are not adequately mitigated in the Checklist. <br /> <br /> <br />58 Checklist p. 4-92. <br />59 California Building Industry Association (CBIA) v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District <br />(BAAQMD), 62 Cal. 4th 369. <br />60 Id. <br />61 San Leandro Zoning Code § 5.08.124(A)(4). <br />104
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.