My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
11A Public Hearings
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2022
>
Packet 05022022
>
11A Public Hearings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2022 4:06:05 PM
Creation date
5/10/2022 4:01:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
5/2/2022
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Ord 2022-005 PP Zoning Map Amendment Second Reading
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Ordinances\2022
Reso 2022-068 PD SPR
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
Reso 2022-069 Tentative Map 2824 Halcyon Drive
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of San Leandro <br />2824 Halcyon Drive Residential Project <br /> <br />32 <br />propose construction of gas stations, dry cleaners, highways, roadways, or other sources that could <br />be considered permitted or non-permitted source of TAC or PM2.5 in proximity to receptors. <br />An assessment was made of the potential health impacts to surrounding sensitive receptors <br />resulting from TAC emissions during construction, and it was determined that project construction <br />would not result in the exposure of nearby residents to substantial concentrations of diesel <br />particulate matter in exceedance of BAAQMD thresholds (Appendix AQ). <br />In addition, the project would not introduce a new stationary source of emissions and would not <br />result in particulate matter greater than BAAQMD thresholds (Appendix AQ). Therefore, a Health <br />Risk Assessment was not performed for this project. Moreover, as described above under question <br />b, the proposed project would not exceed emissions thresholds during construction or operation. <br />Impacts would be less than significant. <br />d. Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting <br />a substantial number of people? <br />Diesel exhaust and ROGs would be emitted during the construction of the project; however, these <br />emissions would be temporary and would rapidly disperse from the project site and would not <br />create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people (Appendix AQ). The project <br />would not involve land uses considered by the 2017 BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines to have <br />greater potential to generate offensive odors, such as wastewater treatment plants, landfills, <br />confined animal facilities, composting stations, food manufacturing plants, refineries, and chemical <br />plants; nor is the project located near any of these uses. This impact would be less than significant. <br />Conclusion <br />The project’s impacts related to air quality emissions would be no greater than the less than <br />significant impacts identified in the General Plan EIR. Neither would they result in new specific <br />effects not addressed in the General Plan EIR, nor require new mitigation measures. Accordingly, no <br />additional review is required.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.