My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
11A Public Hearings
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2022
>
Packet 05022022
>
11A Public Hearings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2022 4:06:05 PM
Creation date
5/10/2022 4:01:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
5/2/2022
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Ord 2022-005 PP Zoning Map Amendment Second Reading
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Ordinances\2022
Reso 2022-068 PD SPR
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
Reso 2022-069 Tentative Map 2824 Halcyon Drive
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Checklist <br />Geology and Soils <br />Environmental Consistency Checklist Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 51 <br />Action EH-1.1.A: Soils and Geologic Report <br />Require soils and/or geologic reports for development in areas where potentially serious <br />geologic risks exist. These reports should address the degree of hazard, design parameters <br />for the project based on the hazard, and appropriate mitigation measures. <br />San Leandro Municipal Code <br />SLMC Section 7.5.175 details soils and foundations requirements including a Geotechnical Engineer <br />or Civil Engineer review of project plans and specifications before issuing a permit for a building <br />where soil and foundation investigation is required; Geotechnical Engineer or Civil Engineer written <br />field report confirming proper building pad and site preparation activities conform with the soil <br />report and approved plans; and Geotechnical Engineer or Civil Engineer final report confirming that <br />site work conforms to the approved plans, specifications, and investigation associated with the <br />project. <br />SLMC Section 7.12.230 details the measures that erosion control, sedimentation control, and <br />drainage plans must have to ensure that storm water from the project site meets the quality <br />standards dictated by the “Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Program Ordinance <br />No. 92-011,” “Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Manual of Standards for Erosion and <br />Sediment Control Measures,” and the “Handbook for Erosion and Sediment Control.” <br />Project-Specific Impacts <br />Quantum Geotechnical, Inc. prepared a Geotechnical Investigation reporting the geotechnical <br />conditions at the project site in July 2020 (included as Appendix GEO). <br />a.1. Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, <br />including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as <br />delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State <br />Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? <br />The project site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone (City of San Leandro 2016a). The <br />nearest fault to the site is the Hayward Fault located approximately 0.9 mile east of the project site. <br />The California Geological Survey Seismic Hazard Zones Map for the San Leandro 7.5-Minute <br />Quadrangle excludes the site from areas mapped for fault rupture hazards (Appendix GEO). <br />Therefore, as the site is excluded from fault rupture hazard analysis because of low risk of fault <br />rupture hazard, impacts related to fault hazards would be less than significant. <br />a.2. Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, <br />including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving strong seismic ground shaking? <br />As with all of the East Bay, the project site is in an area at relatively high risk from seismic shaking. <br />However, the current California Building Code (CBC) contains requirements for structural design, <br />including seismic design specifications. Compliance with mandatory building code structural <br />specifications would result in structures that resist adverse effects from seismic ground-shaking. In <br />addition, the project would be required to comply with recommendations listed in the Geotechnical <br />report (Appendix GEO) in accordance with SLMC Section 7.5.175 which would reduce impacts to <br />structural damage or injuries during strong seismic ground shaking. Therefore, impacts associated to <br />strong seismic ground-shaking would be less than significant.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.