My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
11A Public Hearings
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2022
>
Packet 05022022
>
11A Public Hearings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2022 4:06:05 PM
Creation date
5/10/2022 4:01:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
5/2/2022
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Ord 2022-005 PP Zoning Map Amendment Second Reading
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Ordinances\2022
Reso 2022-068 PD SPR
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
Reso 2022-069 Tentative Map 2824 Halcyon Drive
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Checklist <br />Noise and Vibration <br />Environmental Consistency Checklist Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 81 <br />13 Noise and Vibration <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Less Than <br />Significant or <br />Less than <br />Significant with <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />No <br />Impact <br />Analyzed <br />in the <br />Prior EIR <br />Substantially <br />Mitigated by <br />Uniformly <br />Applicable <br />Development <br />Policies <br />Would the project result in: <br />a.Generation of a substantial <br />temporary or permanent <br />increase in ambient noise levels <br />in the vicinity of the project in <br />excess of standards established <br />in the local general plan or noise <br />ordinance, or applicable <br />standards of other agencies?□ □ □ ■ ■ <br />b.Generation of excessive <br />groundborne vibration or <br />groundborne noise levels?□ □ □ ■ ■ <br />c.For a project located within the <br />vicinity of a private airstrip or an <br />airport land use plan or, where <br />such a plan has not been <br />adopted, within two miles of a <br />public airport or public use <br />airport, would the project <br />expose people residing or <br />working in the project area to <br />excessive noise levels?□ □ □ ■ ■ <br />Analysis in Previous Environmental Document <br />The General Plan EIR analyzes noise and vibration on pages 4.10-28 through 4.10-57. It finds that <br />impacts related to vibration would be less than significant. It finds impacts related to permanent <br />increases in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above existing levels without implementation <br />of the General Plan would be significant and unavoidable because Mitigation Measure NOI-3 in the <br />General Plan EIR was found to be infeasible to reduce noise to less-than-significant levels. The <br />General Plan EIR finds impacts from excessive noise levels during construction would be less than <br />significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-4, reproduced below. The General Plan <br />EIR finds impacts related to airplane noise levels would be less than significant. <br />Mitigation Measure NOI-4 <br />The City of San Leandro shall adopt the following measures as Standard Conditions of Approval or <br />Construction Development Standards for new construction in the city. The Standard Conditions of <br />Approval/Construction Development Standards shall include an exception that states that the <br />Engineering & Transportation Director or his/her designee may waive individual measures upon <br />individual written request from an Applicant after City review.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.