Laserfiche WebLink
Environmental Checklist <br />Noise and Vibration <br />Environmental Consistency Checklist Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 83 <br />and sound power level is the equivalent noise level (Leq). Leq is defined as the single steady A- <br />weighted level that is equivalent to the same amount of energy as that contained in the actual <br />fluctuating levels over a period of time (essentially, the hourly noise level). <br />The relationship between peak hourly Leq values and associated DNL values depends on the <br />distribution of traffic over the entire day (Federal Transit Administration [FTA] 2018). There is no <br />precise way to convert a peak hourly Leq value to a DNL value. However, in urban areas near heavy <br />traffic, the peak hourly Leq value is typically 2 to 4 dBA lower than the daily DNL value. In less heavily <br />developed areas, such as suburban areas, the peak hourly Leq is often equal to the daily DNL value. <br />The project site is located within an urban area where peak hourly Leq value would be typically 2 to 4 <br />dBA lower than the daily DNL value. <br />A 24-hour ambient noise measurement was conducted on the project site from 10:30 a.m. on <br />Monday, May 24, 2021 to 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, May 25, 2021. The primary source of ambient <br />noise was traffic along Halcyon Drive which lies adjacent to the southern boundary of the project <br />site. The noise monitoring results show that the daytime ambient noise levels averaged 58.5 dBA <br />Leq, nighttime noise levels averaged 53.4 dBA Leq and the 24-hour weighted average CNEL was 61.5 <br />dBA CNEL (included as Appendix NOI). <br />Vibration <br />Vibration is sound radiated through the ground. The rumbling sound caused by the vibration of <br />room surfaces is called groundborne noise. Groundborne vibration is almost exclusively a concern <br />inside buildings and is rarely perceived as a problem outdoors. Groundborne vibration related to <br />human annoyance is generally related to root mean square (RMS) velocity levels expressed in <br />vibration decibels (VdB). However, construction-related groundborne vibration in relation to its <br />potential for building damage can also be measured in inches per second (in/sec) peak particle <br />velocity (PPV) (FTA 2018). Based on the FTA’s Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment and <br />the Caltrans Transportation and Construction Guidance Manual, vibration levels decrease by 6 VdB <br />with every doubling of distance. <br />The background vibration velocity level in residential and educational areas is usually around 50 VdB <br />(FTA 2018). The threshold of perception for humans is approximately 65 VdB. A vibration velocity <br />level of 75 VdB is the approximate dividing line between barely perceptible and distinctly <br />perceptible levels for many people. Most perceptible indoor vibration is caused by sources inside <br />buildings, such as operation of mechanical equipment, movement of people, or the slamming of <br />doors. Typical outdoor sources of perceptible groundborne vibration are construction equipment, <br />steel-wheeled trains, and traffic on rough roads. If a roadway is smooth, the groundborne vibration <br />from traffic is rarely perceptible. The range of interest is from approximately 50 VdB, which is the <br />typical background vibration velocity level, to 100 VdB, which is the general threshold where minor <br />damage can occur in fragile buildings. Groundborne vibration levels in excess of 95 VdB would <br />damage extremely fragile historic buildings. <br />The following describes the analysis included in the General Plan EIR and also provides a <br />streamlined review to determine whether there would be project-specific impacts that are either 1) <br />peculiar to the project or the parcel on which the project is located, 2) were not previously analyzed <br />in the General Plan EIR as significant effects, 3) are potentially significant off-site impacts and <br />cumulative impacts that were not previously discussed in the General Plan EIR, and 4) are now <br />determined to have a more severe impact than discussed in the General Plan EIR due to substantial <br />new information.