My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
11B Public Hearings
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2022
>
Packet 06212022
>
11B Public Hearings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2022 1:20:53 PM
Creation date
6/28/2022 1:00:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
6/21/2022
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2022-085 Approving Third Addendum and Planning Entitlements
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
Reso 2022-086 2nd amendment to DDA
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
502
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN LEANDRO SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT EIR ADDENDUM PROJECT <br />CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br /> <br />Page 12 PlaceWorks <br />4.1 AESTHETICS <br />4.1.1 IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE MODIFIED PROJECT <br />Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project: <br />Environmental Issues <br />Substantial <br />Change in <br />Project <br />Requiring <br />Major <br />EIR/MND <br />Revisions <br />Substantial <br />Change in <br />Circumstanc <br />es Requiring <br />Major <br />EIR/MND <br />Revisions <br />New <br />Information <br />Showing <br />New or <br />Increased <br />Significant <br />Effects <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impacts/No <br />Changes or <br />New <br />Information <br />Requiring <br />Preparation <br />of a <br />Subsequent <br />EIR/MND No Impact <br />a) Have a substantial adverse effect <br />on a scenic vista? x <br />b) Substantially damage scenic <br />resources, including, but not limited to, trees, <br />rock outcroppings, and historic buildings <br />within a state scenic highway? <br /> x <br />c) In non-urbanized areas, <br />substantially degrade the existing visual <br />character or quality of public views of the site <br />and its surroundings? (Public views are those <br />that are experienced from a publicly <br />accessible vantage point). If the project is in <br />an urbanized area, would the project conflict <br />with applicable zoning and other regulations <br />governing scenic quality? <br /> x <br />d) Create a new source of substantial <br />light or glare which would adversely affect <br />day or nighttime views in the area? <br /> x <br /> <br />Background: <br />2022 Appendix G Threshold <br />The CEQA Checklist Guidelines for Aesthetics has been updated since those used for the Certified EIR for <br />the Original Project. The changes are detailed below: <br /> <br />I. AESTHETICS. <br />Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, Wwould the project: <br />a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? <br />b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and <br />historic buildings within a state scenic highway? <br />c) In non-urbanized areas, sSubstantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public <br />views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.