My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
11B Public Hearings
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2022
>
Packet 06212022
>
11B Public Hearings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2022 1:20:53 PM
Creation date
6/28/2022 1:00:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
6/21/2022
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2022-085 Approving Third Addendum and Planning Entitlements
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
Reso 2022-086 2nd amendment to DDA
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
502
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN LEANDRO SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT EIR ADDENDUM PROJECT <br />CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br /> <br />Page 46 PlaceWorks <br />4.12 MINERAL RESOURCES <br />4.12.1 IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE MODIFIED PROJECT <br />Would the project: <br />Environmental Issues <br />Substantial <br />Change in <br />Project <br />Requiring <br />Major <br />EIR/MND <br />Revisions <br />Substantial <br />Change in <br />Circumstanc <br />es Requiring <br />Major <br />EIR/MND <br />Revisions <br />New <br />Information <br />Showing <br />New or <br />Increased <br />Significant <br />Effects <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impacts/No <br />Changes or <br />New <br />Information <br />Requiring <br />Preparation <br />of a <br />Subsequent <br />EIR/MND No Impact <br />a) Result in the loss of availability of a <br />known mineral resource that would be of <br />value to the region and the residents of the <br />state? <br /> x <br />b) Result in the loss of availability of a <br />locally-important mineral resource recovery <br />site delineated on a local general plan, <br />specific plan or other land use plan? <br /> x <br /> <br />Comments: <br />The Certified EIR concluded that due to the proposed project’s location in an urbanized city setting, the <br />project would not have a significant effect on mineral resources, and therefore an impact analysis was <br />not prepared for the Original Project. The project site is mapped in Mineral Resource Zone 1 (MRZ-1) by <br />the California Geological Survey, indicating that there is little likelihood that significant mineral resources <br />are present.15 Because the site has been developed and is not considered suitable for protection or <br />conservation, there would be no impacts to mineral resources. Consequently, there would be no impacts <br />with regard to mineral resources under the Original Project or Modified Project. <br /> <br /> <br />15 California Geological Survey (CGS). 1996. Generalized Mineral Land Classification Map of the South San Francisco Bay <br />Production-Consumption Region. Available Online at ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dmg/pubs/ofr/OFR_96-03/OFR_96- <br />03_Plate1.pdf. Accessed January 7, 2020.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.