My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
11B Public Hearings
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2022
>
Packet 06212022
>
11B Public Hearings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2022 1:20:53 PM
Creation date
6/28/2022 1:00:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
6/21/2022
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2022-085 Approving Third Addendum and Planning Entitlements
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
Reso 2022-086 2nd amendment to DDA
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
502
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN LEANDRO SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT EIR ADDENDUM PROJECT <br />CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br /> <br />Page 56 PlaceWorks <br />4.16 RECREATION <br />4.16.1 IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE MODIFIED PROJECT <br /> <br />Environmental Issues <br />Substantial <br />Change in <br />Project <br />Requiring <br />Major <br />EIR/MND <br />Revisions <br />Substantial <br />Change in <br />Circumstanc <br />es Requiring <br />Major <br />EIR/MND <br />Revisions <br />New <br />Information <br />Showing <br />New or <br />Increased <br />Significant <br />Effects <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impacts/No <br />Changes or <br />New <br />Information <br />Requiring <br />Preparation <br />of a <br />Subsequent <br />EIR/MND No Impact <br />a) Would the project increase the use <br />of existing neighborhood and regional parks <br />or other recreational facilities such that <br />substantial physical deterioration of the <br />facility would occur or be accelerated? <br /> x <br />b) Does the project include <br />recreational facilities or require the <br />construction or expansion of recreational <br />facilities which might have an adverse <br />physical effect on the environment? <br /> x <br /> <br />Comments: <br />REC-a. <br />As noted in Section 4.14 of this checklist, the Modified Project would add 16 additional residents, <br />representing an increase of 1.2 percent of the total projected population. This incremental amount would <br />therefore not introduce new impacts or increase impacts associated with recreation services compared <br />to the Approved Project. <br /> <br />REC-b. <br />The Modified Project does not include any changes to the proposed recreational facilities included in the <br />Approved Project. Therefore, the Modified Project would thus not result in a new impact or a substantial <br />increase in magnitude of the existing impacts in terms of introducing new recreational facilities or <br />expanding existing recreational facilities in a way that could harm the environment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.