My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MO 2002-055 to 2002-060
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minute Orders
>
2002
>
MO 2002-055 to 2002-060
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2022 12:14:38 PM
Creation date
7/12/2022 11:51:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minute Order
Document Date (6)
12/31/2002
Retention
PERM
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
funding for these projects had not been developed. In the interim, the applicant has been working <br />with their traffic consultant (TTKM Transportation Engineers), Caltrans, and City staff to <br />develop a definitive implementation plan. <br />Davis/Doolittle Intersection <br />Attachment C to this report includes the new/modified traffic conditions of approval (attachment <br />highlights only certain conditions). The greatest change is the developer's proposal (to be funded <br />by both the developer and FedEx Ground) to advance the total costs of improvements (estimated <br />to be $900,000) required at the intersection of Davis Street and Doolittle Drive, with <br />reimbursement to the' developer to occur through the establishment of a traffic impact fee for the <br />area. The mechanism for the traffic impact fee will be determined by staff and presented to the <br />City Council for review and approval at a date subsequent to an approval of the proposed <br />subdivision. The developer will also take the lead in preparing the design plans, which must be <br />approved by the City and Caltrans prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. <br />Specifically, these improvements include (but are not limited to): addition of a Davis Street <br />eastbound right turn lane; Davis Street westbound right turn lane; Doolittle Drive northbound <br />right turn lane; median modifications; new striping; demolition of existing improvements; right- <br />of-way acquisition; and a new 8-phase traffic signal. The development is conditioned to required <br />approval of the improvement plan by both the City and Caltrans prior to issuance of the first <br />certificate of occupancy. Fifteen percent (15%) of the improvement costs (doubled from the <br />7.4% obligation identified in the traffic study) shall be the ultimate responsibility of the <br />developer and shall not be reimbursed. Traffic fees subsequently collected by the City shall be <br />forwarded to the developer as credit to his 85% reimbursable contribution. At the end of five <br />years, the City agrees to reimburse the developer the difference between 85% of the total <br />improvement costs and all collected traffic impact fees for the intersection improvements. No <br />interest will be paid on the 85% of fees reimbursable to the developer. <br />Signal Timing Plan <br />The more immediate improvement (estimated to reduce signal waiting time by 16%) of traffic <br />conditions includes the developer paying for development of a Signal Timing Plan for signals on - <br />Davis Street between I-880 northbound ramp to Doolittle Drive (to be reviewed and approved by <br />the City and Caltrans). The cost for the preparation and implementation of the Plan will be fully <br />borne by the developer, with implementation to be complete prior to issuance of the first <br />certificate of occupancy for the development. The City and the developer have already initiated <br />discussions with Caltrans to prepare the plan. <br />One residential neighbor of the Davis West subdivision has expressed a concern that the <br />proposed improvements in signal phasing would result in additional vehicles using this portion <br />of Davis Street, and a concurrent deterioration in air quality in the vicinity. Given that a. major <br />contributor to local air quality impacts is from idling vehicles, staff believes that by decreasing <br />the amount of time a vehicle is stopped at a signal, this will have a positive effect on the local air <br />quality. Changing the signal phasing will not increase roadway .capacity. Although drivers <br />typically choose the "path of least resistance", given that the time waiting at a signal is <br />PLN2002-00031—Bayside Business Park October 1, 2002 <br />Work Session #2 Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.