My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MO 2002-055 to 2002-060
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minute Orders
>
2002
>
MO 2002-055 to 2002-060
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2022 12:14:38 PM
Creation date
7/12/2022 11:51:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minute Order
Document Date (6)
12/31/2002
Retention
PERM
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2660 Eden Road Appea 6 October 7, 2002 <br />Revocation of CU-93-14 <br />Attachments: <br />A. Appeals (dated August 15 and 16, 2002) <br />B. Excerpts of Approved Minutes from the July 18, 2002 Board of Zoning <br />Adjustments meeting <br />C. Excerpts of Approved Minutes from the August 1, 2002 Board of Zoning <br />Adjustments meeting <br />D. Board of Zoning Adjustments Staff Report and attachments dated, July 18, <br />2002 <br />E. Board of Zoning Adjustments Staff Report and Resolution dated August 1, <br />2002 <br />CONCLUSION <br />In the interim since the Board of Zoning Adjustments' decision to revoke the use permit, <br />the appellant appears to have brought the business into substantial compliance by limiting <br />the height of the stockpile to less than 15 feet and maintaining required clearances for <br />emergency personnel. Although the appellant's business operation was the cause for <br />damage to the WPCP's fence, he did provide some initial assistance in getting a new <br />fence installed by removing stockpiled materials along this property line. In providing an <br />option for the City Council to continue the matter of the revocation/appeal for a period of <br />three months, staff will monitor the site and report back to the City Council as to whether <br />the business remains in substantial conformance. During this time, staff will also work on <br />reaching an agreement with the appellant for reimbursement of City funds spent on the <br />new fence. Alternatively, the City Council also has the option of upholding the decision <br />of the Board of Zoning Adjustments and denying the appeal. <br />WCommunity Development\Council-RDA\A LL CITY COUNCIL MATERIALU660 Eden Appeal; CU-93-14\2660 Eden Road Appeal CC tpt 10.07-02.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.