Laserfiche WebLink
POTENTIALLY <br />ISSUES <br />POTENTIALLY <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />LESS THAN <br />NO <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />UNLESS <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />IMPACT <br />SOURCES <br />ISSUES <br />MITIGATION <br />IMPACT <br />INCORPORATED <br />RECREATION. 2 <br />I a. Would the project increase the use of existing X <br />neighborhood and regional parks or other <br />recreational facilities such that substantial <br />physical deterioration of the facility would <br />occur or be accelerated? <br />b. Does the project include recreational facilities X 2, 7 <br />or require the construction or expansion of <br />recreational facilities which might have an <br />adverse physical effect on the environment? <br />EXPLANATION: It is likely that subsequent development of the site will not include any public open space areas due to the small <br />size of the parcel and its location within an urban context. Given the scale of development possible in this site, the impacts to the <br />use of existing neighborhood and regional parks/facilities are anticipated to be less than significant. A park -in -lieu fee will be <br />required of any future development involving housing. <br />14 AESTHETICS. Would the project: <br />a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic <br />vista? <br />b. Substantially damage scenic resources, <br />including, but not limited to, trees, rock <br />outcroppings, and historic buildings within a <br />state scenic highway? <br />C. Substantially degrade the existing visual <br />character or quality of the site and its <br />d. Create a new source of substantial light or <br />glare which would adversely affect day or <br />nighttime views in the area? <br />e. Create significant shadow effects on adjacent <br />X 1 1 2 <br />A� <br />X 1 1 2 <br />X 1 1 2 <br />X 1 1 2 <br />UWIu u: <br />EXPLANATION: The property abuts a single-family home with a shingled water -tower that dates back to 1912. Development on <br />this site would block the view of this structure from Estudillo Avenue. This site, however, can already be developed with the <br />existing zoning, therefore changing the zoning will not significantly impact aesthetics on the site. <br />15 CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: <br />a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the <br />significance of a historical resource as defined <br />in section 15064.5? <br />b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the <br />significance of an archaeological resource <br />pursuant to section 15064.5? <br />C. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique <br />paleontological resource or site or unique <br />1 feature9 <br />X 1 1 2 <br />X 1 1 2 <br />X 1 1 2 <br />eo o c <br />d. Disturb any human remains, including those X 2 <br />interred outside of formal cemeteries? IF <br />EXPLANATION: There are no known cultural resources in the project area. Potential impacts related to unknown cultural <br />resources that may be encountered during a construction phase will be required to follow the guidelines outlined in Sections 15064.5 <br />and 15126.4 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). <br />555 Estudillo - Initial Study Checklist 10 December 2001 <br />(Form rev. 11/06/00) <br />2y <br />