My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MO 2002-021 to 2002-025 (Missing 2002-022)
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minute Orders
>
2002
>
MO 2002-021 to 2002-025 (Missing 2002-022)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2022 12:21:28 PM
Creation date
7/12/2022 12:18:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minute Order
Document Date (6)
12/31/2002
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br />programmed for preferential voting and absentee ballots can be printed in a <br />column format to allow voters to indicate preferences. This could be done <br />so long as the preferential election is the only election contest on the ballot <br />and there are no other elections being conducted by the county at the same <br />time. <br />The report further recommends that "early voting" be utilized in these <br />elections. Please be advised that there would be no early voting program if <br />the election were conducted by mail. There is no reason for such a program <br />when every voter has a ballot mailed to his or her residence or mailing <br />address. <br />2. ELIMINATE OAKLAND' S MARCH NOMINATION ELECTION BY <br />CONSOLIDATING ALL ELECTIONS FOR MUNICIPAL OFFICE <br />DURING THE NOVEMBER GENERAL ELECTION USING A <br />SYSTEM OF PREFERENTIAL VOTING. <br />Again, I must remind you that there are no laws, regulations or rules in the <br />State of California detailing how preferential elections are conducted. Until <br />there are State laws that establish and regulate this type of election, the <br />Registrar of Voters cannot conduct this type of election. <br />From a technical and administrative perspective, the new voting system <br />being considered by the County requires that it be capable of conducting <br />elections using a preferential voting process. However, there is no <br />requirement that the system be capable of conducting a preferential election <br />consolidated with a regular election. While it may be technically possible, it <br />presents significant problems for programming, administration and voter <br />confusion, which are described below: <br />A. Two types of logic on touchscreen ballots <br />An election held under the scenario described in the Task Force report <br />would require a voting system to utilize two types of logic to tabulate <br />ballots. The majority of the contests on the ballot would be counted <br />using an accumulation of votes to determine the winner by plurality or <br />majority. Then the system would have to switch logic when the Oakland <br />contests appear in order to count and distribute preferences. None of the <br />election system vendors have been able to assure me that this is possible. <br />R. �w <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.