Laserfiche WebLink
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW DRAFT <br />The City does not have illustrated residential design guidelines. Rather, the BZA or SDSC must find that <br />the architecture is appropriate and consistently applied, that the visual mass is de-emphasized, that the <br />neighborhood's existing visual character is valued, and that the physical impacts to neighbors are <br />minimized. <br />The above procedures apply to single family homes only. The City also requires Site Plan Review for all <br />new multi -family housing. This process includes a public hearing by the Site Development <br />Subcommission (SDSC) and a finding that the design of the project is consistent with the purposes of the <br />Zoning Code. The SDSC hearing requirement is not a constraint and has helped rally public support <br />behind affordable housing projects by ensuring that neighborhood concerns are addressed. <br />Conclusions. The City's design review program has been in effect for less than two years. To date, the <br />program's effect on the quality of new. residential construction has been positive. Design review has <br />addressed public concerns over "teardowns" and "monster homes," and may be helping to conserve <br />moderately sized homes in the City. The new General Plan recommends that residential design guidelines <br />be prepared to clarify the City's expectations for residential projects, and address potential neighborhood <br />concerns as higher density housing is proposed. <br />Design review has not been a constraint to multi -family housing development. In fact, the process has <br />helped a number of affordable projects gain greater public acceptance by engaging the community in a <br />dialogue about project design, parking reductions, and other issues. <br />The new design review requirements have added to the processing time required for very large homes and <br />multi -story additions. This has primarily impacted the "executive" housing market and has not affected <br />affordable housing or basic home improvement projects. The impact of design review requirements on <br />the Planning Department workload should be monitored in the future, to ensure that staffing remains <br />adequate to handle the extra work associated with the new procedures. <br />Affordable Housing Incentive Programs <br />Analysis. San Leandro has had an Affordable Housing Incentive (or "inclusionary housing") Program <br />since the early 1980s. The program requires at least 10 percent of the housing in projects of 20 units or <br />more to be affordable to lower income (80 percent of areawide median) households. The requirement <br />affects developments located outside of Redevelopment Project Areas. For projects within <br />redevelopment areas, the standard is effectively superseded by a state law that requires 15 percent of the <br />new housing units to be similarly affordable. <br />The City also has adopted density bonus provisions, in accordance with state law. These provisions allow <br />a developer to build more units than what is permitted by zoning if a certain percentage of these units are <br />reserved for lower income or senior households. For projects of five units or more, a 25 percent bonus is <br />granted if the developer reserves 10 percent of the units for very low income households, 20 percent of <br />the units for low income households, or 50 percent of the units for senior households. <br />Conclusions. The City is in compliance with State density bonus requirements. The inclusionary housing <br />requirement had an impact on rental housing during the 1980s when several large apartment projects were <br />constructed. It had minimal effects during the last decade due to the sluggish rental construction market. <br />HOUSING ELEMENT 5-13 SAN LEANDRO GENERAL PLAN <br />A411 <br />