Laserfiche WebLink
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW DRAFT <br />and extent of services that are required in the City. An evaluation of infrastructure remains an important <br />step toward ensuring the adequacy of the City's housing sites. <br />Roads. As a built out city in an urban setting, San Leandro experiences periodic traffic congestion on its <br />major streets and highways. The City has adopted a peak hour level of service (LOS) standard of "D" for <br />its signalized intersections. This standard ensures that future capital improvements will be directed to <br />areas where congestion is currently a problem. It also ensures that new development contributes to the <br />cost of improving roads and intersections if traffic studies show the potential for future congestion. <br />Traffic studies are typically required for projects that would generate more than 100 peak hour trips, <br />including most large multi -family housing or mixed use projects. If a traffic study finds that a project <br />could cause an intersection to deteriorate below LOS D, then mitigation is required. This usually consists <br />of improvements to adjacent roads and intersections, but may also include changes to the number of units <br />in the project, or to site design and layout. <br />The 2001 Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan indicated that three intersections were <br />operating at unacceptable levels of service (e.g., LOS E or F) during the evening peak hour. It further <br />found that at least 13 additional intersections could deteriorate to LOS E or F as a result of future <br />residential, commercial, and industrial development in the City and a projected increase in general <br />background traffic. In all but one instance, the EIR concluded that LOS E/F could be avoided by adding <br />turning lanes at the impacted intersections, adjusting traffic signals, and making other improvements <br />along key road segments. <br />For the most part, the cost of these improvements will be passed along to developers through the City's <br />DFSI (development fee for street improvements). At its current level of $900 per unit, the DFSI is not a <br />serious constraint to development. However, fee increases could be necessary to cover the cost of the <br />improvements identified in the traffic analysis, making this a greater constraint in the future. Depending <br />on the scale and location of individual projects, contributions above and beyond the DFSI could be <br />required to address traffic impacts. This could impact project costs. <br />Traffic is of particular concern along the northern segment of East 14'h Street, which now operates at LOS <br />E during the evening peak hour, and along Davis Street near the Downtown BART Station, where LOS E <br />is projected. Approved projects in Oakland and San Leandro will add trips to these road segments and <br />heighten the need for road improvements. <br />During the 1990s, a lane reduction project on East 14'h Street north of Downtown narrowed the street <br />from four to two lanes. While this created a more pedestrian -oriented street environment (and even <br />spurred several new housing proposals), it raised neighborhood concerns about congestion in this area. <br />The current proposal by AC Transit to develop a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line on this street segment <br />could further impact traffic patterns and potentially displace vehicles onto nearby residential streets. <br />Monitoring of traffic conditions in this area will be essential in the future. Improvements to the <br />Dutton/East 14t' intersection have been recommended to address the most immediate concerns. <br />Water. Although water supply will always be a development constraint in California because of the <br />State's susceptibility to drought, there are no immediate or unique service constraints in San Leandro. <br />The City's water delivery system is in good condition and the East Bay Municipal Utilities District <br />HOUSING ELEMENT 5-19 SAN LEANDRO GENERA P AN <br />