Laserfiche WebLink
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW DRAFT <br />costs. The requirements could ultimately lead to an additional impact fee, or a mandate for additional <br />capital facilities (oil and grease separators, etc.) when new projects are proposed. Such requirements <br />could affect not only San Leandro but cities throughout the Bay Area. <br />Solid Waste. Lanfdill capacity is not expected to constrain housing production in San Leandro during the <br />next five years. The City is currently diverting more than 50 percent of its waste from landfills as a result <br />of source reduction and recycling programs. The diversion rate has been increasing during the last few <br />years, and is expected to increase as new recycling programs are implemented. <br />Conclusions. Infrastructure does not pose a significant constraint to housing development in San <br />Leandro. Individual projects will continue to be subject to the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act <br />and will need to prepare engineering studies prior to construction. Although some off -site improvements <br />may be required, costs are expected to be low because most of the sites are already urbanized. <br />A high priority should be placed on the improvement of East 14`b intersections and the replacement of the <br />West Juana sewer line to facilitate development of the sites identified in this Housing Element. The <br />sewer replacement project should be included in the City's capital improvement program. Traffic on <br />Davis Street (near the BART Station) and on East 141h Street in the South Area should be closely <br />monitored to determine the need for intersection improvements before traffic deteriorates to unacceptable <br />service levels. Most of the City's housing sites are on road segments that are projected to operate at LOS <br />D or better throughout the planning period. <br />Environmental Constraints <br />Analysis. San Leandro's ability to grow outward is constrained by hillsides on the east and by wetlands <br />and the open waters of San Francisco Bay on the west. Development of the wetlands is not possible due <br />to state and federal environmental regulations and is also not supported by local policy. Development of <br />the hillsides is not possible because the entire area, with the exception of the former rock quarry site, is <br />publicly owned. Most of the hillside area is contained in Chabot Regional Park and the Fairmont Ridge <br />Open Space preserve. With Oakland to the north and San Lorenzo/Ashland to the south, the City is <br />effectively landlocked. <br />Because of its physical limitations, future housing development will occur entirely through infill and <br />redevelopment. Redevelopment of the former quarry, should it be proposed, would be constrained by <br />steep terrain, proximity to the Hayward Fault, soil stability issues, and public opposition. <br />San Leandro is located in a seismically active area. Groundshaking and liquefaction hazards exist <br />throughout the City, and range from high to very severe. More expensive construction methods are <br />required to reduce the risk of earthquake damage, particularly in multi -story buildings. These hazards <br />exist throughout the Bay Area and are not unique to San Leandro. Only four of the almost 100 sites in the <br />housing site data base are located in the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone (e.g., the zone along the <br />Hayward Fault where special geologic hazard investigations are required before development). These are <br />single family infill sites with a combined capacity of just five units. <br />Flooding is another environmental constraint that could affect housing production. However, only one of <br />46 the 100 or so sites in the adequate sites inventory is in the 100-year flood plain. This site consists of four <br />HOUSING ELEMENT 5-21 SAN LEANDRO GENERAL PL7A�N <br />