My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MO 2002-041 to 2002-045
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minute Orders
>
2002
>
MO 2002-041 to 2002-045
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2022 12:33:38 PM
Creation date
7/12/2022 12:24:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minute Order
Document Date (6)
12/31/2002
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW DRAFT <br />affordable to very low, low, moderate, and above moderate income households. This distribution was <br />based on existing demographics, and an effort to more evenly balance lower income housing within the <br />region. <br />The Draft fair share numbers were published in June 2000. Many jurisdictions appealed their allocations, <br />and a process was initiated to hear and resolve each appeal. This process was completed in March 2001 <br />when the ABAG Executive Board finalized the fair share numbers. At that point, local governments <br />throughout the region were instructed to update their Housing Elements and demonstrate the steps they <br />would take to accommodate their assignments. <br />San Leandro's assignment for the 1999-2006 period was 870 units. This was substantially lower than the <br />assignments for nearby cities, such as Alameda (2,162 units), Oakland (7,733 units), Hayward (2,835 <br />units), and Fremont (6,708 units). The City's assignment included 195 units affordable to very low <br />income households, 107 units affordable to low income households, 251 units affordable to moderate <br />income households, and 317 units affordable to above moderate income households.' Although State <br />law does not require the City to physically develop these units, it does require that adequate sites be <br />provided for their construction and that programs be implemented to facilitate their development. <br />As noted above, almost half of the 1999-2006 period has already passed. The City made significant <br />progress toward meeting its fair share targets between 1999 and early 2002. By June 2002, the City had <br />fully satisfied its above moderate income assignment and had built or approved about one-half of its very <br />low, low, and moderate income assignment. This progress is further documented in Chapter 4 of the <br />Housing Element. <br />Community Participation <br />Like the other elements of the General Plan, the Housing Element was developed through an extensive <br />community participation process. This process included regular meetings of a large citizens advisory <br />committee, periodic briefings to a City Council subcommittee, outreach to homeowners associations and <br />community groups, and a Town Meeting. The process also included formal public hearings before the <br />Planning Commission and City. Council. These hearings were held separately from those conducted on <br />the other elements of the General Plan, allowing a more focused public dialogue on housing issues and <br />policies. <br />In September 2001, the City Council appointed 36 residents, businesspersons, and housing advocates to a <br />Housing Element Advisory Committee. The Committee included 16 individuals who had previously <br />served on the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC), representing diverse geographic areas and <br />many perspectives. It also included five representatives from local non-profit developers; six <br />representatives of local social service, disabled, or homeless advocacy organizations; two rental housing <br />organization representatives; three business community representatives; and several additional interested <br />residents. Although the Committee declined to about 20 members through attrition, it continued to <br />represent a broad cross-section of the community. A wide range of socio-economic groups and interest <br />groups were represented throughout the process. <br />1 These income categories are further defined on Page 3-9. <br />HOUSING ELEMENT 1-4 SAN LEANDRO GENERAL PLAN <br />�591 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.