Laserfiche WebLink
2500 Davis Street <br />PLN2002-00031 <br />September 3, 2002 <br />Action 13.03-B — Require traffic analyses for new development that will generate <br />substantial volumes of traffic. Identify mitigation measures as appropriate to address <br />impacts. <br />Conformance: The Developer has submitted the required traffic report, which has been <br />reviewed and accepted by the Engineering and Transportation Department staff. <br />Mitigation measures are being recommended to mitigate anticipated cumulative impacts. <br />Action 13.04 —C Evaluate the need for public transit as part of the development review <br />process, both for new projects and for re -use or redevelopment projects. <br />Conformance: Project has been conditions to participate (by way of funding) in the <br />LINKS program. <br />Policy 14.04 — Require new development to incorporate design features that make <br />walking, cycling, and other forms of non -motorized transportation more convenient and <br />attractive <br />Conformance: Project has been conditioned to participate in City's LINKS program and <br />to provide bicycle parking for each of the new buildings. New sidewalks along the Davis <br />Street frontage and the new private roadway will provide pedestrian access to nearby bus <br />stops. <br />Policy 26.01 — Promote the long-term conservation of San Leandro's remaining natural <br />ecosystems, including wetlands, grasslands, and riparian areas. Future development <br />should minimize the potential for adverse impacts to these ecosystems and should <br />promote their restoration and enhancement. <br />Conformance: The project site contains jurisdictional wetlands, which are currently being <br />monitored by the Army Corps of Engineers. The project has been developed to minimize <br />impacts to the wetland area from on -site construction and drainage. <br />Permits and/or Variances Granted <br />Staff notes that should the proposal be denied, the current IG zoning designation would <br />allow development of a variety of uses that would not be allowed under the proposed <br />Planned Development (e.g., the current proposal would limit allowed uses to those that <br />are more in keeping with a business park setting). Depending on the specific uses <br />proposed discretionary review (e.g. a conditional use permit or administrative review) <br />might be required. For instance, if the Planned Development is denied, the FedEx Ground <br />facility would still require administrative review (by the Zoning Enforcement Official) <br />for a "small parcel processing center." <br />