My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MO 2000-041 to 2000-045
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minute Orders
>
2000
>
MO 2000-041 to 2000-045
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2022 2:55:16 PM
Creation date
7/12/2022 2:53:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minute Order
Document Date (6)
12/31/2000
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
party - all evidence should be investigated.) <br />b. Have there been similar complaints made against the accused person? <br />(Complaints made many years ago, even beyond what could be considered for <br />discipline, should be looked into and may be considered for purposes of <br />corroborating the complaint this time. E.g. Sexual harassers are usually <br />recidivists and there is often evidence that a harasser has engaged in similar <br />conduct in the past). <br />C. Personality conflicts or friction between the two individuals does not, in and of <br />itself, mean that anything improper occurred or that there was an improper motive <br />or retaliation. However, such evidence should be considered. <br />d. Has there been a violation of the City Sexual Harassment/Discrimination policy? <br />(The investigator should look to see is there are violations of the policy, rather <br />than whether the evidence would support a civil or criminal action). <br />12. When the Employee Denies The Allegations of Misconduct/Evidence of Misconduct <br />is Inconclusive: If the accused employee denies the allegations of misconduct and there <br />is no evidence to substantiate the complaint one way or the other, the Department should <br />do the following: <br />a. Advise the accused employee that if the alleged conduct had occurred, it would be <br />a violation of City policy and would subject him/her to serious discipline, up to <br />and including termination. <br />b. Advise the accused employee that any retaliation against the complaining party is <br />strictly prohibited and may result in disciplinary action, up to and including, <br />termination. <br />C. Advise the accused employee that a copy of the written complaint and the entire <br />investigatory report with the ultimate determination will kept in a separate file by <br />the Human Resources Department. <br />d. Even if the charges cannot be sustained, the Department should take whatever <br />action it can to reduce the chance of the alleged misconduct from occurring again <br />(for example, changing shifts, assignments, supervisors, etc.) <br />e. Advise the complaining party that the Department was unable to conclusively <br />determine that the allegations occurred, however, a copy of the complaint and the <br />disposition will be kept by the Human Resources Department and management <br />will be alert to the problem. The complaining party should be told of any <br />corrective action the Department will make to reduce the chance of the incident <br />happening again. The employee should be told to immediately report any further <br />incidents of sexual harassment or retaliation. <br />13. If Evidence of Harassment Is Found: If the accused employee admits to the <br />misconduct, and/or other evidence in the investigation reveals that the Sexual <br />Harassment/Discrimination Policy was violated, the Department should do the following: <br />a. If the accused employee admits to the misconduct, advise him or her that the <br />conduct must stop immediately and take whatever corrective action is needed to <br />�2 aO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.