My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MO 1999-046 to 1999-050
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minute Orders
>
1999
>
MO 1999-046 to 1999-050
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2022 3:03:04 PM
Creation date
7/12/2022 2:59:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minute Order
Document Date (6)
12/31/1999
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CU-99-4 Appeal - 2 - July 27, 1999 <br />pay periods. Although the business appears to be loan office, the state law categorizes it as a check <br />cashing business. Thus, the Zoning Code provides that a conditional use permit must be obtained <br />to operate a check cashing business in the CC District (Zoning Code Section 2-630 I.). <br />This item was heard before the Board of Zoning Adjustments on May 20, 1999. At this hearing, <br />the Board was split between approving or denying the project. Since only six members of the <br />Board were present, the vote ended in a 3:3 tie. The Board was advised by the City Attorney that <br />this vote essentially constituted a denial of the application and voted to take no further action. <br />Therefore, the application was appealed by the applicant to the City Council. <br />This hearing was originally scheduled for July 19m in accordance with the 45-day provision for <br />appeals in the Municipal Code. The applicant agreed, at staffs request, to defer the hearing to the <br />August date to accommodate the City Council's schedule. The applicant has been paying some rent <br />on the space since May of this year. <br />DISCUSSION AND STAFF ANALYSIS <br />Check cashing or cash advance businesses are conditionally permitted in order to allow a <br />discretionary review of each proposal. The main purpose for any conditional use review is to <br />ensure that the subject use will not have an adverse impact on a particular neighborhood or retail <br />area. Such a review must determine whether the operation of the use is compatible with the <br />surrounding area. Examples of factors to consider include parking availability, noise, proximity of <br />schools and other operational characteristics which might require special consideration. <br />In this case, another check cashing business (California Check Cashing) is located in the same <br />shopping center, approximately 250 feet away from the Advance America site. The primary issue <br />is whether having two check -cashing businesses in the same shopping center could be detrimental <br />to the neighborhood or retail center. Check cashing is a retail service which requires less parking <br />(one space per 300 square feet, Zoning Code Section 4-1704) than retail sales (one space per 200 <br />square feet, Zoning Code Section 4-1704), thus added parking demand is not an issue. <br />Staff was concerned about the presence of cash on the premise and whether this business would be <br />a target for crime. Advance America and other check cashing/cash advancing businesses have <br />indicated that security has not been a problem. According to the San Leandro Police Department, <br />the existing cash advance business has not generated calls for police service. <br />The discussion at the May 20th Board of Zoning Adjustments meeting focused on two opposing <br />viewpoints based on over -concentration of these types of uses and the right of free enterprise. <br />The first viewpoint was that the location of this business so close to another check cashing business <br />creates an over -concentration of check cashing uses. The BZA members subscribing to this view <br />felt that allowing this use would be detrimental to both the shopping center and the surrounding <br />residential area. The shopping center would be hurt because it is a use that contributes little to a <br />retail environment; it has no window appeal and basically creates a blank area which is <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.