My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MO 1997-026 to 1997-030
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minute Orders
>
1997
>
MO 1997-026 to 1997-030
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2022 4:57:33 PM
Creation date
7/12/2022 4:49:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minute Order
Document Date (6)
12/31/1997
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The EDAC's discussion regarding these programs suggest that the City should revie.'v the <br />eligibility criteria to ensure that the programs are used in appropriate locations. <br />Specifically, the EDAC was concerned that these forms of assistance should not be <br />provided for properties that might be targeted for targeted for redevelopment or removal. In addition. one suggestion from among the EDAC members was that the Cite consider <br />making the assistance available to tenants, rather than building owners. to ensure that the <br />programs are used to help support businesses. Alternatively, the City may wish to focus <br />these programs on specific areas that could benefit from a concentration of effort. such as a <br />neighborhood shopping district that is targeted for enhancement. The City might do this bN <br />earmarking new funds explicitly for target areas, or by keeping eligibility broad. but <br />actively marketing the programs in target areas. If the funds are spread too sparsely among <br />projects throughout the City, there may not be sufficient impact to have the desirable effect <br />of enhancing value of surrounding properties. <br />Roles and Responsibilities. City Planning and Redevelopment staff admini <br />rams. ster these <br />programs. <br />Priority: MEDIUM. These are existing programs. <br />Costs and Potential Funding Sources. The design assistance program is funded at a level <br />of approximately $100.000 per year. Fundi <br />awning, sign, and paint program ng comes from the City's CDBG program. The <br />is funded at a level of approximately $60.000 per year <br />through Redevelopment Agency tax increment funds. Based on these figures. the annual <br />cost for this program is HIGH. <br />Action 2.6: On -Call Building Inspector <br />In many cities. difficulty in cutting through "red -tape" is a common complaint given b- <br />businesses who have recently attempted to construct or expand facilities. While San <br />Leandro's existing One -Stop Permit Center facilitates the process of obtaining and <br />completing paperwork necessary to gain regulatory approvals for development projects. the <br />existing On -Call Building Inspector program facili <br />development protates the construction phase of local <br />jects. This is done by roviding <br />inspections rather than re uiring p _ a building inspector to make on -call <br />q that inspections be scheduled in advance. This shortens <br />construction delays b� reducing the turnaround time between finishing one construction <br />step and gaining the inspector's approval to commence the next step In addition. the <br />inspectors are trained to review and verify compliance with building, fire, and planning <br />requirements, reducing the number of inspections which must be scheduled. <br />Roles and Responsibilities. The responsibI M for this program lies with the City <br />Building Division. <br />44 <br />254 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.