MO 1996-006 to 1996-010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CITY COUNCIL OF SAN LEANDRO MINUTE ORDER NO. 96-(None) SUBJECT: CU-95-17; Matter of Appeal by James C. Prola and Alfred J. Fernandes of Board of Zoning Adjustments' Approval of CU-95-17; Conditional Use; to Construct a 122-Unit, Extended -Stay Hotel (Marriott Residence Inn), Including Four, Two -Story Buildings, One, Three -Story Building, and Parking; 80 San Leandro Marina (South Dike Road and Neptune Drive); Assessor's Parcel Numbers 80G-900-2-2, 4, 1-6; JBN Company/John B. Norton, Applicant; CR Commercial Recreation District MEETING DATE: February 5, 1996 The following is an excerpt from the City Council Minutes of February 5, 1996: Matter of Appeal by James C. Prola and Alfred J. Fernandes of Board of Zoning Adjustments' Approval of CU-95-17; Conditional Use; to Construct a 122-Unit, Extended -Stay Hotel (Marriott Residence Inn), Including Four, Two -Story Buildings, One, Three -Story Building, and Parking; 80 San Leandro Marina (South Dike Road and Neptune Drive); Assessor's Parcel Numbers 80G-900-2-2, 4, 1-6; JBN Company/John B. Norton, Applicant; CR Commercial Recreation District. (1098) Council Member Myers moved to continue the matter to March 4, 1996, and to direct staff to further study the impact of traffic and parking, on weekends and during the week, and to have the union and developer get together. The motion was seconded by Council Member Polvorosa. The City Council discussed the motion. In response to questions, Mr. Norton said a delay to March 4,1996, could be a hardship. Mayor Corbett suggested continuing the matter without a date, monitoring progress, and bringing it back to Council before March 4, if possible. Mr. Norton said he would prefer continuing the hearing to February 20, 1996. After continued discussion, the City Council did not agree to a February 20th date. They noted that extensive studies have been conducted related to traffic impact. Council Member Loeffler said an opportunity for dialog between the unions and the developer should be provided. Council Member Perry said March 4th provides for meeting prior to that time and the matter can be brought back earlier with proper noticing. Council Members Kerr and Galvan said they did not see the need for additional staff analysis related to traffic and parking. They said the outstanding issue is the use of the local work force and the labor issue. The City Attorney said the motion is to continue the land -use issue and to request that the potential lessee work with representatives of organized labor to see if arrangements can be made to meet their needs.