Laserfiche WebLink
Housing Resources <br /> <br />Draft Housing Element 4-15 <br />Including a high buffer is particularly important due to the possibility that development or <br />redevelopment in commercial and mixed-use zones could potentially be developed with 100 <br />percent commercial uses. The following zones with units in the Sites Inventory allow for multi-use <br />development: <br /> Commercial Community (CC) <br /> Downtown Area 1 (DA-1) – Retail Mixed Use <br /> Downtown Area 6 (DA-6) – Offices and Mixed Use <br /> South Area 1 (SA-1) <br /> South Area 2 (SA-2) <br /> South Area 3 (SA-3) <br /> B-TOD District <br />There is no minimum residential density for most districts, except for larger parcels in the DA <br />districts and the SA district. However, as discussed in Chapter 3: Constraints, an analysis of <br />development trends from 2011 to 2021 shows an upward trend of the percent of projects in mixed <br />use zones that included residential uses as opposed to those which did not. Since 2011, 14 out of 18 <br />projects in mixed use zones had a residential component, or 78 percent. This trend increased in <br />recent years. Since 2017, 82 percent developments included residential uses and only 18 percent <br />did not. The overall buffer for the Sites Inventory (31 percent) and buffer for low-income and <br />moderate-income units (29 and 26 percent, respectively) surpass the 18 percent gap, meaning the <br />RHNA buffer compensates for the possibility of 100 percent commercial developments. <br />Additionally, the Multi-Family Development Standards project, which was initiated in 2020, reduced <br />constraints to developing residential in Mixed Use zones and encouraging residential development. <br />Zoning Code amendments modified the front setback requirements in the DA districts to remove <br />subjective standards and provide objective standards. These standards reference the street sections <br />of the applicable street type while ensuring adequate building setbacks to accommodate the <br />planned street, sidewalk, and public amenity improvements. In a roundtable discussion hosted by <br />the Alameda County Housing Collaborative on November 29, 2021, housing developers noted that <br />ground-floor retail in mixed use developments faces funding and logistical challenges, and that <br />flexibility of ground-floor use increases the development potential of a mixed use project.10 In order <br />to address this constraint, the Multi-Family Development Standards Project created a path for 100 <br />percent multi-family projects in these locations through a Conditional Use Permit process, thereby <br />increasing the flexibility of potential development options in mixed use zones. The City will also <br />facilitate infill residential development in Priority Development Areas as outlined in Program 8 in <br />Section 6, Housing Plan. <br />4.3 Adequacy of Residential Sites Inventory in Meeting <br />RHNA <br />Table 4.8 outlines details about the sites selected for the Sites Inventory, which is mapped in <br />Figure 4.2. The Sites Inventory includes 2,664 units on 19 sites. There are 815 lower Income units, <br />792 moderate-income units, and 1,057 above moderate-income units. <br /> <br />10 Alameda County Collaborative, 2021. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XYrwZxd3Re0VFWGz119bj8uqS9VdUN4H/view