My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MO 1996-051 to 1996-055
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minute Orders
>
1996
>
MO 1996-051 to 1996-055
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2022 11:27:28 AM
Creation date
7/14/2022 11:24:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minute Order
Document Date (6)
12/31/1996
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br />r APPROVED AND FORWARDED <br />STAFF REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL <br />DATE: November 7, 1996 <br />Wan i n <br />TO: Wandzia Grycz, Interim City Manager Interim ,'� an _ <br />FROM: William K. Algire, Director <br />Engineering and Transportation <br />BY: Gordon Lum, Traffic Operations Engineer <br />SUBJECT: Traffic Calming Pilot Project in Estudillo Estates <br />RECOMN ENDATION <br />Given the success and popularity of the humps, staff recommends three additional humps (about 500 feet <br />apart) be installed on Joaquin, Juana, Dolores, and Maud Avenues as shown on Figure 5 of the attached <br />report. "Before" and "after" traffic volume counts and speed surveys were conducted on of these streets. and <br />also on Estudillo and Sybil Avenues. This data shows that there has not been a shift of traffic from one street <br />to another, and that the humps have been successful in reducing the 85th percentile speeds (e.��., the speed at <br />or below that 85 percent of the observed vehicles are traveling) by an average of 9 niph. 59% of the <br />respondents to the opinion survey expressed a desire for more speed humps. <br />;tall does not recommend the installation of anv traffic circles or speed humps on Estudillo and Sybil. �,yhich <br />means the existing hump on Sybil should be removed. The Fire Department concurs with this <br />recommendation which will allow the arterials (i.e., Estudillo and Sybil) to continue to be used as primary <br />emergency access routes. No devices should be placed on Estudillo and Sybil for the following reasons: 1) <br />both streets serve as emergency access routes not only for the immediate neighborhood. but fora larger area. <br />including Bay-O-Vista. 2) the Institute of Transportation Engineer ITE <br />humps do not recommend them on streets with bus routes due to potential in ury to i standingnes for passengers <br />speed <br />damage to bus axles) or truck traffic, 3) humps or circles on higher volume streets can aause rear end <br />accidents, 4) even a minor shift in traffic from Estudillo or Sybil would be significant to the residents on the <br />non -arterial streets in the neighborhood, and 5) humps or circles may result i <br />especially on Estudillo. n peak hour congestion, <br />Staff shares the concern of many residents and recommends the removal of all existing traffic circles (on <br />Joaquin, Juana, Dolores and Maud at Morgan Avenue). The traffic circles were determined not to be <br />appropriate for speed reduction due to the geometrics of the intersections. While they did slow traffic about <br />the same amount as the humps, traffic was able to pass by them at 20 to 25 mph, which could be dangerous <br />for pedestrians walking parallel to the path of the diverted car negotiating the circle. The circles displace <br />traffic 8 to 10 feet sideways so that some cars, especially those making left turns, come in direct conflict with <br />pedestrians crossing at the circles. <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.