Laserfiche WebLink
In April 1993, Mr. Sullivan applied for a separate permit to install a sliding <br />gate across the driveway from the apartment complex onto Harold Avenue. The City <br />granted the permit but also required the installation of a pedestrian gate per the <br />Building Department, to insure greater pedestrian safety. (It was not required by the <br />Fire or Building Code, however.) At the same time, the Fire Department required the <br />removal of the tire spikes to insure its emergency access to the first floor of the <br />apartment complex (since the alternative, a 20 foot fire lane in the complex parking <br />lot, could not be achieved given the configuration in the parking lot.) The sliding <br />vehicular gate and the pedestrian gate were installed and the spikes were removed. <br />In February 1996, City staff received complaints from Gary Feliciano regarding <br />the access. Mr. Feliciano represents the owner of a multi -family complex on Harold <br />Avenue. In response to his complaints of increased vehicular and pedestrian traffic, <br />staff contacted Mr. Sullivan and asked him to close the pedestrian gate. Mr. Sullivan <br />indicated that he would not. Then, on February 28th, the City received a petition <br />signed by 59 residents of Harold Avenue requesting that Site -Development Approval <br />75-44 be revoked. The petition cited problems regarding increased pedestrian and <br />vehicular traffic, noise, litter, and on -street parking. In particular, the petitioners <br />maintain that the pedestrian gate encourages complex tenants to park on Harold <br />Avenue, rather than in the complex parking lot, and use the gate for access. <br />City staff contacted Mr. Sullivan and Mr. Feliciano, who represented the <br />4 <br />