My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 1996-021 to 025
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
1996
>
Reso 1996-021 to 025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2022 1:13:21 PM
Creation date
7/14/2022 12:01:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
12/31/1996
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br />RESOLUTION NO. 96 - 25 (1102/1123) <br />RESOLUTION OPPOSING LEGISLATIVE CHANGES TO <br />"THE LITTLE DAVIS BACON ACT" REGARDING <br />CALIFORNIA PREVAILING WAGE REGULATIONS <br />WHEREAS, the construction industry plays a vital and important part in the <br />economic well being of the City of San Leandro by providing jobs and a steady <br />stream of revenue into the community; and <br />WHEREAS, a dynamic and growing construction industry is dependent upon a <br />work force of highly trained and skilled construction workers; and <br />WHEREAS, the wages determined to prevail in local communities are required <br />to be paid to construction workers on State and local agency public works <br />projects and which are responsible for maintaining a stable and skilled work <br />force, providing a living wage to workers and their families, providing health <br />and retirement benefits to workers and their families, and helping to support <br />apprenticeship training programs; and <br />WHEREAS, the University of Utah recently completed an in-depth study of the <br />economic impacts resulting from the repeal of prevailing wage legislation in nine <br />states and which conclusively shows that the wages of all construction workers, <br />union and non -union alike, were significantly reduced, that the states lost <br />substantial income and sales tax revenues which far exceeded any savings realized <br />on the cost of public works projects, that construction work -place injuries <br />skyrocketed because of the use of unskilled workers, that apprenticeship training <br />was reduced by almost half, and that construction projects experienced an <br />increased number of cost overruns and change orders; and <br />WHEREAS, all available evidence conclusively proves California's prevailing <br />wage requirements do not inflate the cost of public works; but, to the contrary, <br />help maintain a highly trained and stable work force who reside in the <br />communities where they are employed; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.