My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 1997-086 to 090
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
1997
>
Reso 1997-086 to 090
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2022 4:26:23 PM
Creation date
7/14/2022 4:22:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
12/31/1997
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. SCOPE OF WORK <br />• Develop impact significance criteria that are specific to the site's <br />geotechnical constraints and the components of the proposed project <br />that may induce impact. The CEQA Guidelines, the DMG Checklist <br />and the City's General Plan policies and ordinances will form the <br />foundation of the criteria. However, the criteria will be structured to <br />bring out the salient aspects of the hazards and impacts specific to the <br />site and development proposal. <br />Identify the manner in which proposed grading may by affected by <br />and/or impact soil engineering constraints. If engineering constraints <br />will remain, identify measures to minimize hazards to structures and <br />infrastructure. Discuss the overall rippability of the rocks and the <br />general need for blasting. <br />Assess the impacts of the proposed project on the topography of the <br />site including extent and height of cuts and fills, changes in slope, <br />alteration of ridge line configurations, unique or outstanding <br />topographic features, and gradients. In discussion with the project <br />engineers, describe any import/export of geologic materials. Discuss <br />how the proposed grading plan conforms with policies in the San <br />Leandro General Plan and City Grading Ordinance, as applicable. <br />Describe proposed (or conceptual) foundations, structures and design <br />and discuss the way in which proposed building designs, including both <br />structural and non-structural elements potentially may respond to the <br />site's geotechnical and seismic hazard constraints. Relate these <br />generally to requirements of the Building Code. <br />Using the seismic hazards information combined with projections of <br />the Bay Area Earthquake Preparedness Project (BAREPP), identify the <br />major sources of earthquake hazard at the site and the possible <br />response of the project to a maximum credible earthquake on nearby <br />major faults (e.g., Hayward, San Andreas or Calaveras Faults). Special <br />emphasis will be given to earthquake hazard of the nearby Hayward <br />Fault. The assessment will consider hazards to building foundations, <br />structures, and typical non-structural elements of the project. The <br />applicant's proposed building designs (if available) will be reviewed for <br />their overall potential earthquake response. ESA will summarize <br />pertinent observations from recent major earthquakes about the <br />performance of structures and slopes and relate these to applicable <br />components of the project. <br />Drawing on recommendations of ABAG, BAREPP, USGS, CDMG, <br />California Seismic Safety Commission, City of San Leandro policy and <br />others, develop mitigation measures directed to ensuring that the <br />development will be subject to minimal hazards with acceptable levels <br />of risk and minimal loss of vital emergency services. <br />12 of 37 <br />Boulders Residential Development EIR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.