Laserfiche WebLink
complex. Mr. Sullivan testified that he reinstalled the tire spikes to prevent two way traffic via <br />Harold Avenue; the pedestrian gate is desirable for the convenience of tenants and requires a key <br />for access; complex property managers clean up litter (regardless of source); that he has surveyed <br />Harold Avenue for impacted parking problems and could find none; <br />Tenants of the complex also testified to the necessity for vehicular access via Harold <br />Avenue because of the traffic hazards created by the high volume and speed of traffic on <br />Washington Avenue (as well as the difficulty in making a safe, left hand turn onto Washington <br />Avenue). They challenged the assertion that there is speeding on Harold Avenue and noted <br />speeding is precluded by the street's length, the tire spikes and the slow opening of the gate. <br />Tenants noted that the pedestrian gate provides a safer and more convenient route of travel than <br />having to exit and enter the complex via Washington Avenue. <br />At the conclusion of the meeting, the Planning Commission voted to refer the matter to <br />the City Council with a recommendation to adopt the recommendations of Staff noted in the July <br />5, 1996 report except that the Commission recommended: <br />The pedestrian gate be kept open (assuming it requires a key for entry from Harold <br />Avenue) and functions properly; <br />The City should work with the neighbors to study the feasibility of speed bumps; and <br />The City should study the feasibility of limiting the hours of accessibility to both the <br />pedestrian and vehicular gate. <br />On October 7, 1996, the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency held a meeting to <br />consider the modification or revocation of the Approval. As noted above, the Council may <br />G:UOANNVSMORrrL\RESFINDC. CC <br />