Laserfiche WebLink
• Identify alternative feasible regional sources of suitable beach sand/gravel (i.e., <br />compatible grain size distribution and sediment quality) in quantities sufficient for beach <br />nourishment <br /> <br />• For each alternative consultant shall develop a list of benefits, impacts, risks, and <br />concept-level engineering cost estimates to provide a basis for alternatives comparison <br /> <br />• Consultant shall prepare a qualitative discussion of each alternative's anticipated <br />resilience to sea-level rise, based on the SLR projections selected in task 4.6 <br /> <br />• Consultant shall collect photographs of similar constructed projects and will prepare <br />figures and renderings suitable for public presentation and to allow the public to visually <br />understand the changes to the existing conditions proposed under each alternative <br /> <br />• Consultant shall work with the City and TAG to apply the evaluation criteria (Task 4.6) to <br />evaluate the alternatives and select a preferred alternative that will be progressed <br />through conceptual design <br /> <br />• Preparation of the conceptual design (approximately 35%-completion level) will begin <br />following selection of the preferred alternative. Although this scope does not include <br />preparation of permit applications, consultant shall meet with the BRRIT to conduct a <br />preliminary review of the project. No follow-up with the BRRIT is assumed. <br /> <br />Consultant shall submit the following 35%-complete design package for review and comment: <br /> <br />• 35% design drawings including: project overview, grading plan, and illustrative cross- <br />sections <br /> <br />• Conceptual order of magnitude probable construction costs <br /> <br />• Conceptual Design Report that packages up all prior memos as appendices, describes <br />selection of the preferred alternative, and summarizes the design process <br /> <br />Task 5.1 Deliverables <br />• Draft and Final Conceptual Design Report in PDF format <br /> <br />• Design graphics for alternatives, including plan-view illustrations, cross sections, and <br />reference photos or graphical renderings illustrating the main features of each alternative <br /> <br />• Conceptual Design of Selected Alternative: <br /> 35% Drawings, including: Grading plan/Project Layout, cross sections, schematic details <br /> Conceptual order of magnitude probable construction costs <br /> <br />Task 5.1 Schedule <br />• 18 months from NTP