My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Annexation - Eden Township Hospital Dist, 02-15-1972
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Recorded Documents
>
Annexations
>
Annexation - Eden Township Hospital Dist, 02-15-1972
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2022 4:49:27 PM
Creation date
10/26/2022 4:45:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
Recorded Document Type
Annexation
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
A Clarification <br />Aic-Pub <br />Hdan Facilities <br />6 <br />Qufttions concerning administra- <br />tive procedures and appeals under <br />the State Health Planning Law have <br />been clarified in an opinion by Attor- <br />ney General Evelle J. Younger. <br />Younger says that the voluntary <br />area health planning agency in each <br />of the 12 areas throughout the state <br />designated by the Legislature must <br />hold a public hearing in conducting <br />its business of approving or disap- <br />proving applications concerning con- <br />struction expansion or alteration of <br />hospital and other health facilities. <br />"The public hearing," the Attorney <br />General continued, "must be held <br />[upon reasonable notice] before a <br />minimum of five persons, a majority <br />of whom shall be consumers" of <br />health services. <br />"The decision consisting of find- <br />ings of fact and recommendations <br />must be made by concurrence of a <br />minimum of five persons who were <br />present at the hearing, a majority of <br />whom shall be consumers." <br />"In short," Younger said, "there is <br />no workable quorum unless (1) there <br />is a minimum of five board members <br />present, and (2) regardless of <br />whether there are five or more mem- <br />bers present the majority must be <br />consumers." <br />"Once- the quorum is established <br />and the composition of the meeting is <br />such as to meet the requirements of <br />the rules, then the voting is by a <br />simple majority." <br />The opinion also indicated that the <br />21-member Health Planning Coun- <br />cil is empowered to hear appeals <br />from: (1) applicants whose applica- <br />tions have been denied; and (2) a <br />minority but more than a third of <br />the board members of a local or area <br />health planning agency whose recom- <br />mendations have been rejected. <br />The appeal of the applicant, Youn- <br />ger noted, should first be made to <br />the consumer members of the other <br />voluntary area health planning agen- <br />cy which was designated by the <br />Health Planning Council as an ap- <br />peals body for the agency rejecting <br />the application. <br />Younger went on to explain that <br />under the Health Planning Law the <br />decision which is reviewable by the <br />courts is the final decision rendered <br />by the Health Planning Council. <br />"Judicial review of this decision <br />Is available through administrative <br />mandamus as provided in section <br />1094.5 of the Code of Civil Pro- <br />cedure," he said. <br />The opinion was prepared by <br />Deputy Attorn_ey_General Edward M. <br />I Blasco, and was issued in response <br />tr, inquiries from Robert L. Jackson, <br />executive secretary of the State <br />Health Planning Council. <br />t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.