Brightview Landscape Services Inc NPSA Park Turf 20230918

Home

808 Rejection of Proposals (a) Proposals may be rejected if they show any alteration of form, additions not called for, conditions to the specification, incomplete forms and/or content, erasures, or irregularities of any kind. (b) The City reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals for improper form upon finding the Proposer to be irresponsible or incompetent, collusion, inability to perform the contract, lack of or poor response from references, or any other reason found to be detrimental to the City's interest or welfare. (c) Neither the City nor the Director, or designee shall be deemed responsible for any oral clarification, nor will it be binding. 809 Reference Checks and Proposal Review (a) The City will check the Proposer(s) references in order to determine that the Proposer(s) are “responsible” and capable of performing the requirements of the contract. It is the responsibility of the Proposer to provide current contact information for all references. (b) Interviews may be held with the Proposer(s) to confirm information submitted in proposal documents, including requirements, methodology for performing services; as well as present any additional information and answer any clarifying questions by the panel. (c) During the interviews, the City would expect to meet the Project Manager, Principal(s)/Owners Rep, day-to-day Supervisor and any other staff that have a critical role in successful implementation of the contract. (d) The Proposer(s) may be disqualified at any point of the selection process, if it is found that items submitted in the proposal are incomplete, incorrect, or are found to be untrue or unresponsive, or if it is determined that the bidder is incapable of performing the services, as requested. 810 Evaluation of Proposals, Qualifications and Deeming Contractors as Qualified Proposals will be reviewed by a panel and deemed either qualified or not qualified to perform the work, based on the proposal content, response to Technical Proposals and per the following criteria: (a) Ability of the Contractor to provide innovative approaches and techniques in the delivery of services and partnering with the City to reach high quality outcomes. (b) Demonstration of exceptional ability to provide a high level of quality service standards under similar conditions to institutions, private or public of similar size and area requirements. (c) Quality and performance assessments of work quality and working relationships with current and recent clients that indicate high levels of satisfaction and effectiveness. (d) Proven competencies in the delivery of effective and efficient maintenance services and implementation of best management practices. (e) Policies that provide highly trained, competent staff at every level of the organization. (f) Demonstration of a high level of stability and long-term high-quality performance of the Contractor. Exhibit A 30 DocuSign Envelope ID: 88C7DA92-A192-4D3B-8C30-0528956DCD71