My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10A Public Hearings
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2023
>
Packet 20231120
>
10A Public Hearings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2024 5:57:18 PM
Creation date
12/26/2023 3:17:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
11/20/2023
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Ord 2023-012 Ord 2022- PLN21-0031 Rezoning
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Ordinances\2023
Reso 23-169 Reso 2022 - PLN21-0031 SPR, CUP, Adm Exception
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Checklist <br />Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br /> <br />Draft Initial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration 75 <br />Table 18 Project Operational GHG Emissions <br />GHG Emissions Source Total GHG Emissions (MT CO2e per year) <br />Warehouse 584.5 <br />Office Use 129.2 <br />Parking Lot 44.6 <br />Landscaping 0.6 <br />Amortized Construction Emissions 13 <br />Total Annual Operational Emissions 772 <br />GHG = greenhouse gas <br />MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent <br />Mobile sources include estimated passenger vehicle and truck use associated with the project. <br />Totals may not sum due to rounding. Construction emissions are amortized over the 30-year lifetime of the project. <br />Source: updated modeling outputs are included at the end of Appendix B <br />The City of San Leandro updated and approved its CAP in July 2021, which outlines strategies for <br />reducing GHG emissions through various activities, including but not limited to water conservation, <br />energy conservation, land use design and orientation, transportation-oriented development, and <br />renewable energy source use. According to the CAP, “The CAP is prepared consistent with CEQA <br />Guidelines for Plans for the Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions (CEQA Guidelines Section <br />15183.5). Additionally, the CAP meets the criteria from the BAAQMD CEQA Thresholds for <br />Evaluating the Significance of Climate Impacts from Land Use Projects and Plans, as described under <br />Significance Thresholds. This allows the 2021 CAP to support and streamline environmental review <br />of GHG emissions related to future development projects within the city.” Therefore, a project that <br />would comply with the goals and policies of the City’s CAP would have less-than-significant GHG <br />impacts. <br />Table 19 below compares the project’s consistency with the City’s CAP. As shown therein, the <br />proposed project would be consistent with the CAP and accordingly would be consistent with an <br />adopted, qualified GHG reduction strategy. Therefore, the proposed project would not generate <br />GHG emissions that would have a significant impact on the environment. Impacts would be less <br />than significant.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.