My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10A Public Hearings
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2023
>
Packet 20231120
>
10A Public Hearings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2024 5:57:18 PM
Creation date
12/26/2023 3:17:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
11/20/2023
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Ord 2023-012 Ord 2022- PLN21-0031 Rezoning
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Ordinances\2023
Reso 23-169 Reso 2022 - PLN21-0031 SPR, CUP, Adm Exception
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Checklist <br />Geology and Soils <br /> <br />Draft Initial Study – Mitigated Negative Declaration 61 <br />7 Geology and Soils <br /> <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Less than <br />Significant <br />with <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Less-than- <br />Significant <br />Impact No Impact <br />Would the project: <br />a. Directly or indirectly cause potential <br />substantial adverse effects, including the <br />risk of loss, injury, or death involving: <br />1. Rupture of a known earthquake <br />fault, as delineated on the most <br />recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake <br />Fault Zoning Map issued by the <br />State Geologist for the area or <br />based on other substantial evidence <br />of a known fault? □ □ ■ □ <br />2. Strong seismic ground shaking? □ □ ■ □ <br />3. Seismic-related ground failure, <br />including liquefaction? □ □ ■ □ <br />4. Landslides? □ □ ■ □ <br />b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the <br />loss of topsoil? □ □ ■ □ <br />c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that <br />is unstable, or that would become <br />unstable as a result of the project, and <br />potentially result in on- or off-site <br />landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, <br />liquefaction, or collapse? □ □ ■ □ <br />d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined <br />in Table 1-B of the Uniform Building Code <br />(1994), creating substantial direct or <br />indirect risks to life or property? □ □ ■ □ <br />e. Have soils incapable of adequately <br />supporting the use of septic tanks or <br />alternative wastewater disposal systems <br />where sewers are not available for the <br />disposal of wastewater? □ □ □ ■ <br />f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique <br />paleontological resource or site or unique <br />geologic feature? □ ■ □ □
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.