Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Consulting Services Agreement between City of San Leandro and Last revised 10/28/2024 <br />HDR, Inc. for Nutrient Alternatives Evaluation Exhibit A – Page 5 of 7 <br />A process model of existing conditions and various final and interim treatment process alternatives <br />based on the tasks below. <br />Task 4 – Conceptual Alternatives Evaluation <br />Task 4.1 – Review Interim Operational Optimization Options <br />This subtask intends to suggest operational optimization options for WPCP compliance with the <br />interim nutrient limits for the next 10 years (before final limits take effect). HDR will request and <br />review H2OWork's historic treatment plant operating parameters and suggest solutions for <br />H2OWorks to meet the interim permit limits with a reasonable safety factor based on available plant- <br />specific data. Furthermore, HDR will also leverage the Water Research Foundation #4973 web- <br />based plant optimization tool that Mike Falk (Project Manager) developed as Co-Principal <br />Investigator under #4973. <br />HDR will review existing H2OWorks process operations strategies and discuss key criteria for <br />potential operational improvements based on discussions with the plant operation leadership team. <br />ASSUMPTIONS T 4.1: <br />The workshop will last up to two hours and be attended by up to three HDR team members. <br />The draft and final TM will be up to five pages (excluding appendices). <br />Task 4.2 Develop Conceptual Nutrient Removal Options <br />HDR will present and discuss a range of potentially viable conceptual nutrient removal options <br />applicable to the WPCP and quickly screen them down to a shorter list for a more detailed <br />evaluation in collaboration with H2OWorks. HDR will categorize options into logical categories and <br />rank them according to the criteria developed in the above tasks. <br />For nutrient limits, the conceptual alternatives will consider the proposed interim and final limits in <br />the draft third watershed permit and provide removal alternatives that will, at a minimum, be able to <br />meet currently known nutrient limits. The City will provide the proposed interim and final limits <br />agreed upon with EBDA and its member agencies. <br />Proposed conceptual alternatives will also consider the potential for the RWQCB to issue future <br />nutrient removal limits that may be more stringent than what is currently known. <br />Another effort under this task will be to evaluate the level of removal that would be achieved if <br />WPCP fully utilized the available existing infrastructure as much as possible to keep costs down. <br />HDR will evaluate what level of treatment would be achieved by presenting concepts for two <br />scenarios: <br />Scenario 1: Limiting project cost to approximately $5 million. <br />Scenario 2: Limiting project cost to approximately $10 million. <br />Task 4.3 Meetings: HDR will prepare, attend, and present information to WPCP staff at two <br />meetings: <br />Docusign Envelope ID: F4C31A54-5BDC-41AE-BF85-10613D6DCA60