CSA HDR Inc Nutrient Analysis 11-20-2024

Home

Consulting Services Agreement between City of San Leandro and Last revised 10/28/2024 HDR, Inc. for Nutrient Alternatives Evaluation Exhibit A – Page 6 of 7 Alternative Discussion Meeting #1 (up to three hours in duration; attended by up to three HDR team members): Identify data gaps. Discuss which unit processes have capacity. Develop a list of conceptual alternatives to consider (this scope is based on as many as three alternatives). Present concept for a $5 million and a $10 million alternative. Alternative Discussion Meeting #2 (up to three hours in duration; attended by up to three HDR team members): Present the facility needs and adverse and ancillary impacts for each conceptual alternative. Make recommendations for a more detailed look in the next round (formal RFP) ASSUMPTIONS T 4.3: Each meeting will last up to three hours and be attended by up to three HDR team members. The alternatives evaluation will consider facility needs, semi-quantitative costs, and the adverse and ancillary impacts. The draft and final technical memorandum (TM) will be up to 10 pages (excluding appendices). This TM will consist of an executive summary and include the work products prepared and presented for this task order No. 1 as PowerPoint presentation slides. Please note the following information: Any cost, value, or savings estimates HDR provides. Inc. are intended for comparative evaluation purposes only and do not constitute a detailed evaluation or prediction of actual project costs, value, or savings. These estimates are based on the information available to HDR, Inc. and their experience and qualifications as professional engineers. However, it is important to note that HDR, Inc. cannot guarantee that the actual project cost, value, or savings will not differ from their estimates, as they have no control over the impact of various factors affecting these values. Task 4.4 – Design Criteria and Alternatives Evaluation Criteria Development This optional task is to collaboratively develop the proposed criteria to be employed when screening nutrient removal alternatives. HDR will facilitate a workshop (up to two hours, attended by up to three HDR team members) to discuss and agree on key design and alternative evaluation criteria for the alternative’s evaluation. Tradeoffs and cost implications of various design criteria will be clearly explained to WPCP staff. DELIVERABLES T 4: Meeting minutes and the corresponding PowerPoint presentations (as a PDF). Decision Flowchart Matrix. Draft Executive Summary TM (up to 10 pages, as a PDF). Docusign Envelope ID: F4C31A54-5BDC-41AE-BF85-10613D6DCA60