My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8A Public Hearings
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2025
>
Packet 20250121
>
8A Public Hearings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2025 2:03:11 PM
Creation date
9/8/2025 3:58:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
Document Date (6)
1/21/2025
Retention
Perm
Document Relationships
Reso 2025-008 Rejecting Appeal (PLN24-0040)
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
228
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COPY <br />File #:24-496,Version:1 <br />existing parking area near the north property line. The Wireless Telecommunications Facility would include an 80-foot <br />high monopine with four levels of antennas and an equipment shelter (approx. 1,100 square feet) at the base of the tower . <br /> Two antenna levels would be reserved for co-locations by other carriers. <br />The proposal includes establishing a six-foot wide utility easement to bring power and fiber lines from Peralta Avenue to <br />the facility, and a 20-foot wide utility and access easement from San Leandro Boulevard to the facility. <br />STAFF ANALYSIS <br />Conditional Use Permit <br />In the DA-2 zoning district, a Conditional Use Permit is required for new monopoles . <br />Consistency Development Regulations / Specific Design Criteria <br />The project complies with specific design criteria for new freestanding towers, as listed in Attachment 3 - Development <br />Regulations, and as summarized below: <br />·Providing camouflaging in the form of a monopine; <br />·Incorporating branches and bark cladding to support the monopine design; <br />·Routing conduit underground and through the trunk of the monopine; <br />·Securing the facility with a masonry wall; and <br />·Landscaping the facility with live plants to provide a visual buffer. <br />Factors Considered in Evaluating Wireless Facilities Applications <br />Pursuant to Zoning Code Section 4.04.376(K), the Planning Commission shall consider several factors in evaluating the <br />proposed monopine: <br />·Height of the cell tower - The monopine would be 80 feet in height. The applicant has submitted an Alternative <br />Sites Analysis (Attachment 7 - Alternative Sites Analysis), which demonstrates that 80 feet is the minimum height <br />needed to provide effective wireless service in the target coverage area. Per Z.C. Section 4.04.376(C)(1), the <br />height limitations in the DA-2 zoning district do not apply to Wireless Telecommunications Facilities. <br />·Proximity to elementary schools and residential structures, property lines, and district boundaries - The subject <br />site is not located near any elementary schools. The proposed Wireless Telecommunications Facility would be <br />located a sufficient distance from residential properties to meet federal Radio Frequency (RF) emission <br />standards, as documented in Attachment 5 - EME Report. <br />·Visual and other potential impacts to surrounding land uses - The applicant has submitted Photo Simulations <br />(Attachment 4), with vantage points from within Siempre Verde Park, and Park Street, a residential street east of <br />the subject property. The photo simulations demonstrate that the monopine would not create any negative visual <br />impacts. <br />·Surrounding topography - The property is relatively flat and capable of accommodating the proposed facility. <br />·Surrounding tree coverage and foliage - On both the subject property and nearby properties, there are medium- <br />height evergreen cypress trees, and tall deciduous and evergreen trees (such as spruces, pines, and cypresses) <br />that are consistent with the proposed monopine design. <br />·Design of the facility and the characteristics that reduce or eliminate visual impacts - The masonry wall would be <br />constructed to match existing masonry on the property and to provide landscaping. The monopine would provide <br />sufficient branches and cladding to achieve effective camouflaging. (See Attachment 1, Exhibit B Project Plans, <br />Sheet C-2.2, Northeast Elevation). <br />·Existing and proposed parking, as well as site ingress and egress - The facility would establish a 20-foot wide <br />access easement, through an existing driveway, from San Leandro Boulevard to provide sufficient site access. <br />City of San Leandro Printed on 12/17/2024Page 2 of 4 <br />powered by Legistar™ <br />Att C -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.