Laserfiche WebLink
Executive Summary <br /> <br />Environmental Impact Report ES-5 <br />Alternative 3 (Airport Parking Land Use). Under the Airport Parking Land Use Alternative, the <br />proposed industrial building would be constructed on the project site, nearly consistent with the <br />proposed project. Alternative 3 assumes that the industrial building and associated surface parking <br />lot would be approximately the same size and design as the proposed project, which would require <br />the same demolition and construction activities as the proposed project. Once construction is <br />complete, Alternative 3 assumes the proposed building would not operate as a warehouse. Instead, <br />the building would operate as covered vehicle parking serving the Oakland International Airport. <br />The new surface parking areas would also be for airport parking. Because the building would not <br />operate as a warehouse, more surface parking would be provided on-site compared to the <br />proposed project because larger parking spaces and areas for tractor trailer maneuvers would be <br />eliminated from the project design. Alternative 3 assumes that the new building would not include <br />natural gas connections, as there would not be demand to heat internal spaces used solely for <br />vehicle parking and storage that could not generally be met with electric heat. <br />The Airport Parking Land Use Alternative would fulfill the project objective to create a modern <br />warehouse structure that contributes to the aesthetics of the surrounding area through the <br />redevelopment of an obsolete and underutilized property, although the building would not operate <br />as a warehouse. Alternative 3 would not fulfill the other objectives of the project, which are <br />generally centered on creating industrial employment and industrial productivity, which would not <br />be accomplished from airport parking. <br />Refer to Section 6.0, Alternatives, for the complete alternatives analysis. <br />Areas of Known Controversy <br />The EIR scoping process did not identify any areas of known controversy for the proposed project. <br />Responses to the Notice of Preparation of a Draft EIR are summarized in Section 1, Introduction. <br />Comments pertained to a range of issues, but most notably air quality, airport hazards, greenhouse <br />gas emissions, hazardous materials and soil and groundwater contamination, noise, transportation, <br />and tribal cultural resources. <br />Issues to be Resolved <br />The proposed project would require site plan review and grading and building permits, as well as a <br />tree removal permit, use permit, and height exception. In addition, given the proximity of the <br />Oakland Internation Airport to the project site, a No Hazard Determination for the warehouse was <br />issued from the Federal Aviation Administration pursuant to Federal Aviation Regulations Part 77. <br />Further, several mitigation measures discussed in Section 4.2, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of <br />this EIR would require either approval or oversight from the California Department of Toxic <br />Substances Control (DTSC). Issues to be resolved also include the choice among alternatives and <br />whether or how to mitigate potentially significant effects of the project. <br />Issues Not Studied in Detail in the EIR <br />Section 1.4, Issues Not Studied in Detail in the EIR, summarizes issues from the environmental <br />checklist that were addressed in the Initial Study (Appendix A). As indicated in the Initial Study, <br />there is no substantial evidence that significant impacts would occur to the following issue areas: <br />Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Energy, <br />Geology and Soils, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning, Mineral Resources,