My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2026-021 Discipline - Councilmember Aguilar
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2026
>
Reso 2026-021 Discipline - Councilmember Aguilar
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2026 9:42:18 AM
Creation date
3/4/2026 9:37:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
3/2/2026
Retention
PERM
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
597
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />24 <br /> <br />individuals may lack the requisite “street smarts” or common sense, as if those attributes were <br />mutually exclusive. <br /> <br /> Bowen contends that both Simon and Aguilar “dismissed Sbeydeh Viveros-Walton’s <br />superior qualifications, experiences, answers, and overwhelming public support” for her <br />candidacy; “Only after intense public pressure highlighting how much more qualified and <br />supported Viveros-Walton was and outrage at the prospect of spending money on a special <br />election over the course of the two weeks, Simon and Aguilar finally voted to appoint her at the <br />next meeting.” Bowen contends that their lack of support for the most qualified woman for the <br />City Council is part of a pattern of bias against highly qualified women in positions of authority. <br /> <br /> Ultimately, an examination of Simon’s decisions reveals a pattern of supporting male <br />candidates over highly qualified female candidates. He supported a male candidate for City <br />Council without considering the relative qualifications of the other candidates or the description <br />of the City Council member’s duties and qualifications and attempted to justify his decision that <br />Anderson’s lack of higher educational attainment should not be a factor for consideration. He <br />also insisted that a less qualified male employee who was not even interested in the City <br />Manager position be selected without having reviewed the job description for the position. In the <br />absence of legitimate non-discriminatory business reasons for these decisions, the evidence <br />suggests that gender bias may be a motivating factor in these decisions. <br /> <br /> Aguilar nominated a female candidate, whom others viewed as inexperienced and <br />unqualified to serve in a leadership role as a City Council Member. Azevedo and Aguilar <br />nominated and supported Sulema Hernandez with whom Aguilar has had a close personal <br />relationship, but Hernandez lacked prior relevant experience in government or in a leadership <br />role. According to her application, Hernandez is a licensed real estate agent and family <br />resource specialist, a cosmetologist (since 1998), and a volunteer at her PTA and other school <br />district related organizations. She was a past recipient of the Mayor’s Kindness Award. At one <br />point during her interview at the special session, when she was asked a question by Gonzalez, <br />she hesitated and stated, “I’m so nervous, I am sorry,” which calls into question how she would <br />be able to respond to community questions and concerns when making difficult decisions on <br />behalf of the City. <br /> <br /> Aguilar claims he considered the following factors in his advocacy of Hernandez: 1) her <br />volunteer experience; 2) her vast knowledge of San Leandro; 3) her support for the community; <br />4) her public participation; and 5) her diversity of background. Aguilar identifies as a gay, <br />disabled, person of color who has mentored women of color, including Celina Reynes, so he <br />supported Hernandez to be appointed to the City Council. <br /> <br /> Although Aguilar denies that he has a problem with women who hold positions of power <br />as contended by Bowen and other witnesses, Council Members Ballew, Cox, Cutter, and <br />Reynes, as well as Bowen, Robustelli, and Cameron believe that the justifications proffered by <br />Simon and Aguilar indicate their lack of support for strong women in positions of authority <br />reflecting gender bias. Reynes believes that Aguilar exhibits disdain towards smart women. <br />She believes that Aguilar likes to surround himself with uneducated people who support him and <br />do not pose a threat to him. Robustelli also observed that Aguilar seemed to “want the least <br />educated woman who could be told what to do.” Viveros-Walton believes that Aguilar supported <br />Sulema Hernandez because he could exert control over her, noting that she had not even <br />registered to vote until she submitted her application, which indicates her lack of civic <br />engagement. <br /> <br />J. Bowen and Other Witnesses Recounted That Simon and Aguilar Have Undermined <br />Public Works Director Sheila Marquises and Other Staff, But Marquises Does Not <br />Contend That Their Behavior Is Driven by Gender Bias <br /> <br /> Bowen observed that during City Council meetings, Simon has challenged and <br />undermined the expertise of Public Works Director Sheila Marquises, who has a strong <br />Exhibit A <br />Resolution No. 2026-021 Page 24
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.