My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2026-021 Discipline - Councilmember Aguilar
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2026
>
Reso 2026-021 Discipline - Councilmember Aguilar
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2026 9:42:18 AM
Creation date
3/4/2026 9:37:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
3/2/2026
Retention
PERM
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
597
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />23 <br /> <br />any disciplinary action taken against her, Simon’s characterization of these emails appeared to <br />be another attempt to disqualify Cameron from being promoted to City Manager. <br /> <br /> Like Aguilar, Simon claimed that he had heard that Cameron had mishandled an <br />interview with a Spanish television reporter — that she had been unprofessional, but he admits <br />that he did not know that she was merely following instructions by her supervisor at the time, <br />City Manager Robustelli, who instructed Cameron not to speak to reporters on behalf the City. <br />Simon is aware that the City has a Public Information Officer through whom all media inquiries <br />should be referred, but he does not know who holds that position. <br /> <br /> Ultimately, Simon’s justifications for not supporting Cameron’s appointment to City <br />Manager were not credible. He failed to present any legitimate non-discriminatory reasons for <br />pushing the City Council to consider selecting a less qualified male employee over Cameron, a <br />highly qualified female employee who had the support of nearly all City department managers <br />as recounted by Gonzalez. <br /> <br /> During Deborah Cox’s tenure on the City Council, the City hired three City Managers. <br />She recalls that despite qualified female applicants for the position, Simon advocated hiring a <br />young African American male candidate who did not seem to know how to tackle the pressing <br />issue of homelessness. According to Cox, Simon and Aguilar were opposed to hiring <br />Robustelli, but they did not provide a legitimate reason why they preferred a male candidate <br />who was less experienced and qualified than Robustelli. She cited these as examples of <br />Simon’s gender bias against qualified women in positions of authority. <br /> <br /> Ultimately, the City Council voted for Cameron to be selected as the City Manager and <br />she was not deprived of this employment opportunity. However, the foregoing witnesses’ <br />accounts support a finding that Simon and Aguilar were likely influenced by gender bias in their <br />support of a less qualified male employee who was not interested in the position. <br /> <br />I. Former and Current City Council Members Contend That Simon Supported the <br />Selection of a Less Qualified Male Candidate Over Sbeydeh Viveros-Walton as <br />City Councilmember and Aguilar Supported a Less Qualified Female Candidate <br />Who Would Not Likely Challenge Him <br /> <br /> Bowen claims that Simon supported a less qualified male candidate (out of a total of 18 <br />applications) over Sbeydeh Viveros-Walton to replace Celina Reynes on the City Council after <br />she resigned. Bowen recounted that during the February 13, 2024, Council Meeting, “Simon <br />would only support less qualified men,” and he refused to acknowledge that Viveros-Walton was <br />qualified for the role despite her relevant experience in public and community service. Ballew <br />believed that the only candidate who answered all questions from the City Council Members <br />was Viveros-Walton, who “could hit the ground running.” <br /> <br /> Robustelli believes that Simon ignored the superior qualifications of two of the female <br />candidates, Viveros-Walton and Pcyeta Stroud. Simon nominated David Anderson, with whom <br />he served on the Senior Commission for two years. Simon described Anderson as having “life <br />experience,” is smart, and “stands up to issues.” Although Simon could not recall whether he <br />reviewed the description of the City Council member’s duties and qualifications, he claims that <br />Anderson was qualified for the position because Anderson had experience balancing budgets <br />and dealing with community issues, which he believes is relevant to the Council Member’s <br />responsibilities. When queried about the factors he considered when determining whether <br />someone was qualified for the Council Member position, he stated the candidate must care <br />about the community and presumably Anderson has demonstrated this because of his public <br />service background. Simon stated that he could not “speak to the relative qualifications” of the <br />other candidates, and he was “not saying that Sbeydeh Viveros-Walton was not qualified, but <br />[he] just thought Anderson was more qualified.” Viveros-Walton recalls that in advocating for <br />the selection of David Anderson, Simon underscored the value of “life experiences” and stated <br />something along the lines of “smart people got us here,” as if to imply that intellectually inclined <br />Exhibit A <br />Resolution No. 2026-021 Page 23
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.