My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Finance Highlights 2006 1101
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Committees
>
Finance Committee
>
Finance Highlights 2006 1101
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2007 4:02:15 PM
Creation date
11/17/2006 4:25:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Committee Highlights
Document Date (6)
11/1/2006
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2006 1120
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2006\Packet 2006 1120
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />CITY COUNCIL FINANCE COMMITTEE <br /> <br />November 1, 2006 <br />4:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. <br /> <br />San Leandro City Hall <br />835 East 14th Street <br />San Leandro, California <br />(Sister Cities Gallery) <br /> <br />HIGHLIGHTS <br /> <br />Committee Members: (Chair) Mayor Young, Councilmembers Starosciak and Stephens (absent). <br /> <br />City Staff Present: <br /> <br />City Manager Jermanis, Assistant City Manager Hollister, Finance <br />Director Baloca, Human Resources Director Caire, Deputy Finance <br />Director Rodriguez, and Budget and Compliance Manager Chan. <br /> <br />Public Present: <br /> <br />Residents Lou Filipovich, Marianne Camp, Craig Williams, Mike Katz, <br />Charles Gilcrest, and Liana Molina. <br /> <br />The meeting was called to order at 4:05 p.m. <br /> <br />1. Discussion Regarding Living Wage <br /> <br />City Manager Jermanis introduced the discussion by stating that living wage is a controversial <br />topic and could have wide ramifications on the City's operations; therefore, it warrants <br />continuous discussion to establish the definition of living wage and the goals to be incorporated <br />in a new ordinance. <br /> <br />Jermanis explained that living wage is a recent approach adopted by some government agencies. <br />Generally, the prevailing wage approach is used and is applied to workers employed by an <br />agency's outside contractors. Most of the time, the ordinance does not apply to agencies <br />themselves. State, County and local government employees' salary and wage rate structures are <br />often developed by benchmarking against each other and are often comparable to prevailing <br />wage levels. Living wage requirements are most often enforced on city service contractors, <br />businesses leasing city property, and business receiving city assistance above a certain amount. <br /> <br />Jermanis also explained that the City currently mandates any company bidding on City projects <br />or service contracts to pay prevailing wage. In order to enforce compliance, the City does require <br />added resources for monitoring its prevailing wage contractors. <br /> <br />Some City's part-time employees are paid less than the suggested living wage. If the pay for <br />these employees were to be brought up to the living wage level, then the City's whole wage scale <br />for all job classifications would most likely have to be escalated accordingly. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.