Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Landscaping, Walls and Paving <br /> <br />The proposed site plan and elevations show the conceptual landscape composition to include a <br />palette containing various trees, flowering shrubs, vines and ground covers for the project. The <br />private rear yard areas for the individual units would be landscaped by the future property owner. <br />The applicant has stated that the perimeter of the subject property and the separation of the <br />proposed backyard areas would be improved with new solid wood fencing approximately seven <br />feet tall. The proposed plans also include the use of colored concrete with tooled joints and a <br />colored-stamped concrete to enhance the appearance of the driveway. <br /> <br />STAFF ANALYSIS <br /> <br />Land Use / Densitv <br /> <br />The General Plan Land Use Map designates the subject property for Residential High Density <br />use. The Zoning Map is consistent with the General Plan and designates the property as a Multi- <br />Family (RM}.District. <br /> <br />The proposed rezoning of the project site from RM1800 Residential Multi-Family to <br />RM2500(PD) Residential Multi~Family, Planned Development Overlay District will subject any <br />proposal on the property to the City's discretionary review process, which will ensure that the <br />new development will be compatible with the existing area. As proposed with six units, the <br />overall site density would equate to approximately 17.5 units per acre (six units on 15,000 square <br />feet, or one unit per 2,500 square feet). The existing RM1800 zoning could permit a density of24 <br />units per acre, or up to eight units on the subject property. The project would conform to the <br />General Plan mentioned above since RM2500 is conditionally compatible with the Residential <br />High Density designation. In addition, the densities assigned to the General Plan land use <br />designations are not minimums, therefore decreasing the on-site density would not make the <br />project inconsistent. <br /> <br />Staff believes that a medium density and detached residential development would be <br />considerably more compatible than a high density development proposal. A medium density <br />proposal would bring slightly lower impacts of traffic generation. The detached unit design <br />lessens any impact of the project appearing overdeveloped to the adjacent residential area with <br />less bulk and mass than a larger building with a greater number of units and being attached to <br />one another. <br /> <br />Reasons for Planned Development <br /> <br />The proposal requires the division of property into single-family parcels with less area than the <br />5,000 square-foot minimum requirement (Zoning Code Section 2-530). Also inherent to small lot <br />single-family residential development, there will be shallow setbacks. In this case, the side yards <br />between the units are four feet, six inches where five feet is the minimum required. The rear <br />yards have a setback of 10 feet, where the 15 feet is the minimum required Zoning Code Section <br />2-542 F.). The planned development will request exceptions to these minimum requirements <br />listed in the Zoning Code. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Staff Report <br />PLN2005-00 141 <br /> <br />June 8, 2006 <br />Page 4 of9 <br />