Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Board of Zoning Adjustments Regular Meeting, July 20, 2006 <br />Excerpt of the Minutes item PLN2005-00063 <br /> <br />Page 2 of8 <br /> <br />Elevations showed how the home would step up the hill, how it would look from <br />Vistagrand above and from Darius Way below. From Vistagrand, the house would have a <br />single-story profile. Elevations of the carriage house were displayed from all site lines. <br />The turnaround would have high retaining walls with vegetation to screen them. <br />Screening vegetation would also be planted on the street side of the carriage house. <br />According to phone conversations from some Vistagrand residents, some view <br />obstruction of the vegetation to the south would occur because of this project, but the <br />views to the west would not be obstructed. No views of the bay from adjacent neighbors <br />on Darius Way would be obstructed, because the proposed home would sit behind them <br />to the east. <br /> <br />Notices were sent to property owners within a 500-foot radius of the project and the <br />project was twice presented to the Bayo Vista Homeowners Association. The site plan <br />had been mounted on a large board and placed on the site this past weekend. Story poles <br />had previously been put up. Telephone calls, noted in the staff report, had been received <br />concerning hillside integrity, two emails were given to each Board Member that objected <br />to the size of the project, and a letter to Secretary Penaranda, who was not in the office at <br />this time, was sent by Yvette Rice that also objected to the size of the home. The <br />Engineering Department was not aware of any geological problems related to the site. <br />Standard Conditions of Approval required that geotechnical reports be submitted to the <br />city before issuance of any building permits. The city zoning codes had no maximum <br />square footage limits for homes. Staff was confident that this project would not be a <br />precedent setting case, as there were few sites within the city that could accommodate <br />another project of this size. Another option could be to subdivide this lot into many <br />different, smaller lots for single-family homes, which had brought little interest from the <br />homeowners association. <br /> <br />Member Sidari asked if a fire hydrant would be close by or would sprinklers be required <br />for the home. He understood that no more than ten adults could reside in this home. How <br />would the city control that, and how would the city ensure that the rooms were not being <br />rented out? Would a license be required for renting? <br /> <br />Planner Barros replied that a fire hydrant was located in front of the site, but because of <br />the fire flow, the house would have to be sprinklered. If any complaints were received <br />about the occupancy, the Fire Marshall could look into the actual situation. A business <br />license would be required for renting. Renting a room was allowed by the city. <br /> <br />Member Eliason asked where the 30-foot height was located on the home. <br /> <br />Planner Barros pointed out a roof height that would be approximately 30 feet from the <br />average slope of the hill. <br /> <br />Member Marr asked how many vehicles could be parked, as seven bedrooms assumed <br />many vehicles would be on site. <br />