My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3B Public Hearing 2007 0904
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2007
>
Packet 2007 0904
>
3B Public Hearing 2007 0904
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2008 12:45:58 PM
Creation date
8/31/2007 3:14:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
9/4/2007
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2007 0904
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2007\Packet 2007 0904
8B Consent 2007 0917
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2007\Packet 2007 0917
8C Consent 2007 0917
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2007\Packet 2007 0917
8D Consent 2007 0917
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2007\Packet 2007 0917
Ord 2007-019
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Ordinances\2007
Ord 2007-020
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Ordinances\2007
Ord 2007-021
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Ordinances\2007
Reso 2007-111
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2007
Reso 2007-112
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
307
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Species of Concern. Therefore, any tree removal during nesting season (April to mid-August) <br />would be likely to impact this species. Implementation of General Plan Policy 26.04 that <br />specifically addresses the protection of habitat for species of special concern and ensures that <br />local planning development decisions do not damage the habitat of species of special concern in <br />the City would reduce the potential impact to the Alameda Song Sparrow to a less-than- <br />significant level. <br /> <br />San Leandro Creek, which is located in the Strategy area, is a federally-protected wetland and is <br />identified by the US Fish & Wildlife Service in the National Wetlands Inventory. A substantial <br />portion ofthe development associated with the TOD Strategy would be immediately adjacent to <br />the creek and could impact the riparian corridor. If vegetation is removed, potential nesting and <br />cover sites for animals, beneficial shading for watercourses, and bank stability could all be <br />impacted. As stated in Table 2-1, Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures, on Page 2-5 of <br />the DEIR, the TOD Strategy incorporates General Plan policies and Mitigation measures <br />to reduce potential biological impacts to a less-than-significant level. For example, General Plan <br />Policies 25.02 through 25.06 establish provisions to ensure creekside development does not <br />adversely impact San Leandro Creek. These policies provide guidelines for orientation of new <br />structures in relation to the riparian corridor, habitat restoration, and creek maintenance. <br />Implementation of these policies as part ofthe TOD Strategy would reduce potential impacts on <br />San Leandro Creek to a less-than-significant level. <br /> <br />Cultural Resources <br /> <br />There are numerous historical resources existing within the TOD Strategy Area, and <br />development taking place under the TOD Strategy has the potential to adversely affect these <br />resources either temporarily or permanently. In addition, downtown San Leandro and the <br />adjacent BART station are known to contain archaeological resources from the mid 19th Century. <br />As a result, excavation of development sites identified in the TOD Strategy could unearth or <br />disturb archaeological resources. Based on the highly developed and pre-disturbed nature of the <br />TOD Strategy area, the likelihood of encountering human remains during implementation of the <br />strategy is considered to be low. Therefore, cultural resources such as historical, archaeological <br />and paleontological resources in the City of San Leandro could be cumulatively impacted by <br />future development. However, because the impacts resulting from the TOD Strategy are <br />congruent with the City of San Leandro's General Plan, implementation of General Plan policies <br />38.04,38.06,38.07,38.09 and adherence to applicable provisions ofthe City of San Leandro <br />Historic Preservation Ordinance would reduce impacts to a less-than-significant level. As set <br />forth in Table 2-1, Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures, on Page 2-5 of the DEIR, the <br />TOD Strategy incorporates General Plan policies and Mitigation measures to reduce potential <br />cultural resource impacts to a less-than-significant level. <br /> <br />Hazardous Materials <br /> <br />While implementation of the TOD Strategy does not include land uses that would emit harmful <br />types or levels of emissions or handle hazardous materials, like those commonly associated with <br />industrial land uses, it could result in the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials <br />occurring in close proximity to residences, commercial business or other population centers. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.