Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~Urban <br />@t@Habkat <br /> <br />they wiU be approximately the same as the prior period. The DEIR mUSt analyze bow the TOO Plan. <br />"nder each alternative develoDment scenario, achieves the City's RHNA requirements (CUlTCllt and <br />future ). <br /> <br />I. b. The San Leandro General Plan, 2002. contains the foHowing goal and policy: <br /> <br />"Goal 3: Provide housins opportunities and improve economic access to housin, for all lell1lenta of the <br />communi~ _ . <br />Policy 3.02: Encourage a mix ofpri~ ranlw to provide housing choices for residents ofaJl incomes and <br />1II1i. .. <br /> <br />The current version of the TOO Plan. in Ihc context of current market conditions, willlikcly result in the <br />development ofm()j1;)y for-sale market-rate houain, that is unaft'ordable to the ~ority of the City's <br />residents. The TOO Plan includes 3.400 new units ofhousina built over 30 yean, of which only 1'% <br />must be 'aft'ordlable' per the City's inclusionary zoning ordinance.' <br /> <br />Market rate housing in the City, both for-sale and rental, is unaffordable EO a nuvority of households. <br />For-saic, market"rate units are HnBffordable to over 78% of San Leandro households using HUD <br />standards in which no more than 3'% of one's income shouJd be spent on for-ale housing.2 And <br />today's median rent, at S I, J 81 tor 8 two bedroom apartment in a:he downtown area, is unaftbrdable to <br />approximately 40% of the City households.) <br /> <br />As applied, the current inelusionary zoning law will not meet the housina needs of all segTMnu O/lhe <br />COMIIJunity and it will not provide a fia11 ",ix of price P'tII'IpS to provide horutng choicafor rultknta of <br />all lnco.",.s. As it stands and as RlCQ8I1ized on page 4.9004 of the DEIR, the City's inclusionary zoning <br />law (QrdinaR<:e No. 2006-00 1) requires that 1 S% of all units developed be "affordable." However, in <br />for-sale projects, the inclusionaty units must only be affordable to households oamm, 70% or 110% of <br />the Area Median Income (AMI) for AllU11eda County. As of2006. a fimUy of four at 70% of the AMI <br />was makinl $58,660 and at J 10% AMI was makJRI $83,800.' As 0(2005 (the mOil recent data <br /> <br />I The Mnl .us.-..... of Ibc TOO PlID (City of SIll lMftctro, DtlwntOWn Salt 1..1IIIdro TItIIIII,..o,IM/wl Dne/optMnt <br />~, MtrieIA....nJ DW7~ April 20(6) predicIS that liven . reIIdwIy flat NIdIlIIIIIket Md rtlItlveIy blab <br />00IIIII'IMlti0A ooas, me IDIrkM will plOduce ....Iy for.nIt houaIns widain the TOD Plea... 11ac MtrIr6l ~"'. <br />howcwr, alto ~ Cht.,.. poteadaI tar 100% affardIble houIinJ prqIfCIIlt.... CIty ...hI a.v..p to__ <br />F....... sue. and LocalIU....... b IUCh houIiDc. <br />:1 AJ of ZOOS. a medla1 picxxlliJl&lc family bomc in San LCMdro wu $530.000 n for. fIImiI1to aftbrd Ibo moncb1y <br />paymeatI on such . bouI. the)' would DNllO .... .leaa $116,000.2 AI dill dme, .. ....... .,,. OfbollHholds ill cbe <br />downIowD ... of San Leandro and men 1haa 77.'" of all of SIn L.Idro'. houIdIoIdI 0lUJI0d leu 1baA $116.000. <br />) A ftmJIy m.. WI! Ill'" $3,937 alDOllltb or 547,240 .1W'1e) dorcIi'IIlt of'$I,I'llJnoa1h. ArrWa,..... bav.' <br />dl~ IDUCh llaoc 200~. .""ro~ 40% ofSao Leandro houIeholds eouId DOt dbrd this reat lOda)1. AftbcdabUIty for <br />I1lnIll bOuSina is b...cl'upon HUb detlnldon of no men thin 30% of'bouIeboId income toiIla 1OWII'd ..... boutJn& coac. <br />.. 0IlIa from 1he 2006 Income GuicW.. for AI.modI Couaty. <br /> <br />45614* Sbeet. Suite 1205, Oaklaaclr CA 96612 <br />(&'10) 13t..95l0 . 'ax: (510) __961D <br />www.~ <br /> <br />51199 ~d <br /> <br />l.\1lI~ N\1h1 <br /> <br />9t966E99tS <br /> <br />6S:tt Le9~/t~/ge <br />